Solved

SQL 2008 Server side Trace vs Client side trace/profiler

Posted on 2011-09-25
1
388 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
Is there any reason not to use server side trace and instead use client side trace?
0
Comment
Question by:itnifl
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 51

Accepted Solution

by:
Steve Bink earned 500 total points
ID: 36597217
None that I know of.  The preferred method is a server-side trace due to load concerns.  Here is a very good article explaining the load a client-side trace can create:

http://sqlblog.com/blogs/linchi_shea/archive/2007/08/01/trace-profiler-test.aspx
0

Featured Post

Free eBook: Backup on AWS

Everything you need to know about backup and disaster recovery with AWS, for FREE!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Azure Functions is a solution for easily running small pieces of code, or "functions," in the cloud. This article shows how to create one of these functions to write directly to Azure Table Storage.
This post contains step-by-step instructions for setting up alerting in Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) using Grafana.
Via a live example, show how to setup several different housekeeping processes for a SQL Server.
This is a high-level webinar that covers the history of enterprise open source database use. It addresses both the advantages companies see in using open source database technologies, as well as the fears and reservations they might have. In this…

695 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question