?
Solved

spf records

Posted on 2011-09-27
9
Medium Priority
?
900 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
i created an spf record using a wizard but when i test the spf by sending an email to spf-test@openspf.org, i believe the results show that it is not working properly.

"spf-test@openspf.org
mailout02.controlledmail.com #550 5.7.1 <spf-test@openspf.org>: Recipient address rejected: SPF Tests: Mail-From Result="none": Mail From="xxx@simex.ca" HELO name="mail.simex.ca" HELO Result="none" Remote IP="216.191.157.78" ##"

Here is my spf record;
"v=spf1 a mx mx:mail.simex.ca -all"

In the DNS Manager, the zone record type is "TXT" with the subdomain name of "simex.ca"

Please advise.



0
Comment
Question by:jnsimex
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:Papertrip
ID: 36713140
[root@broken ~]# dig txt simex.ca +short
"mail.simex.ca. 86400 IN TXT v=spf1" "a" "-all"

Open in new window

That is what your TXT record looks like when queried.

It should look like this:
"v=spf1 ip4:216.191.157.78 ~all"

Open in new window


0
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:Papertrip
ID: 36713161
Unless you plan on changing the IP of mail.simex.ca often (probably not), then using the SPF mechanisms "a" and "mx" don't need to be used, all they do is cause another lookup to be performed.  Putting in just the IP of server(s) sending your mail is the best approach.  Also, even if you were to use "a" and/or "mx", you don't have the syntax correct for it in either your example or in the "real" results from my external query.

0
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:Papertrip
ID: 36713213
If you have more than 1 IP you can do either of the following, depending on how many IP's there are (SPF TXT record character limit is 255).

"v=spf1 ip4:216.191.157.78 ip4:1.2.3.4 ip4:5.6.7.8 ~all"

Open in new window

or, if there are too many IP's for 1 record, use CIDR notation
"v=spf1 ip4:216.191.157.78/29 ~all"

Open in new window

0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 

Author Comment

by:jnsimex
ID: 36713236
I went with your idea of using a fixed ip in my spf record.

The dns lookup for my TXT record returned "v=spf1 ip4:216.191.157.78 ~all"

I resent the test email and the results are the same.

"spf-test@openspf.org
mailout02.controlledmail.com #550 5.7.1 <spf-test@openspf.org>: Recipient address rejected: SPF Tests: Mail-From Result="none": Mail From="xxx@simex.ca" HELO name="mail.simex.ca" HELO Result="none" Remote IP="216.191.157.78" ##"


0
 
LVL 21

Accepted Solution

by:
Papertrip earned 2000 total points
ID: 36713270
While you are editing DNS, you should try and make the PTR for mail.simex.ca match the A record:
[root@broken ~]# dig mail.simex.ca +short
216.191.157.78
[root@broken ~]# dig -x 216.191.157.78 +short
157-078.tor.economux.com.

Open in new window


Cool your new record looks great
[root@broken ~]# dig @156.154.70.1 txt simex.ca +short
"v=spf1 ip4:216.191.157.78 ~all"

Open in new window


Your SPF record has a TTL of 7200 -- 2 hours.  You can't rely on test results from the same tool if it looked up your SPF record within the last 2 hours, have to wait for it to expire from their cache.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jnsimex
ID: 36713326
So I created a PTR record for host name mail.simex.ca

78.157.191.216.IN-ADDR.ARPA

Not sure if this correct but in the text box, it said to enter in the IP address in reverse order + ".IN-ADDR.ARPA"

Yes, it looks much better now.

Thanks for your help.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jnsimex
ID: 36717241
Can you explain your logic for using a softfail vs a fail in the SPF?
0
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:Papertrip
ID: 36718660
SPF hardfail will break forwarding 100% of the time.  If you are not concerned with people being able to forward emails from your domain, then you can turn on hardfail.   This is an inherent and well-known problem with SPF.  Keep in mind that it is a common practice for users to setup auto-forwards for their mail, say from their vanity domain to their gmail account for example.

How the receiving server treats SPF softfails is completely up to them.  Also how your mail client interprets results in the headers from authentication checks plays a role.  That is one of the problems in the email world -- you can't dictate how everyone will setup (or break) their receiving servers.  Gmail for example will display a warning that SPF softfailed, and that you should be concerned of a potential spoof.

Basically SPF is far from the end-all for mail authentication, it should be used in conjunction with at least DKIM.  I realize now I should have included that in the earlier replies, not sure why I didn't in hindsight.

How you decide to implement it is completely up to you -- even the big guys do things their own way because they take into consideration things like DKIM signatures, ADSP, receiver policies etc etc... all depends on how you want your mail to be treated.

[root@broken ~]# dig txt _spf.google.com +short
"v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ip4:173.194.0.0/16 ?all"
[root@broken ~]# dig txt hotmail.com +short
"v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com include:spf-c.hotmail.com include:spf-d.hotmail.com ~all"
[root@broken ~]# dig txt paypal.com +short
"v=spf1 include:pp._spf.paypal.com include:3rdparty._spf.paypal.com include:3rdparty1._spf.paypal.com include:3rdparty2._spf.paypal.com include:c._spf.ebay.com ~all"
[root@broken ~]# dig txt facebook.com +short
"v=spf1 ip4:69.63.179.25 ip4:69.63.178.128/25 ip4:69.63.184.0/25 ip4:66.220.144.128/25 ip4:66.220.155.0/24 ip4:69.171.232.128/25 ip4:66.220.157.0/25 ip4:69.171.244.0/24 mx -all"

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:jnsimex
ID: 36718787
Cool man. Thanks for the following up.
0

Featured Post

Ransomware Attacks Keeping You Up at Night?

Will your organization be ransomware's next victim?  The good news is that these attacks are predicable and therefore preventable. Learn more about how you can  stop a ransomware attacks before encryption takes place with our Ransomware Prevention Kit!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Occasionally you run into the website or two that will not resolve properly using your own DNS servers.  Some people simply set up global forwarders for their DNS server.  I don’t recommend doing this because it can cause problems resolving addresse…
BIND is the most widely used Name Server. A Name Server is the one that translates a site name to it's IP address. There is a new bug in BIND (https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272), affecting all versions of BIND 9 from BIND 9.1.0 (inclusive) thro…
Michael from AdRem Software outlines event notifications and Automatic Corrective Actions in network monitoring. Automatic Corrective Actions are scripts, which can automatically run upon discovery of a certain undesirable condition in your network.…
Add bar graphs to Access queries using Unicode block characters. Graphs appear on every record in the color you want. Give life to numbers. Hopes this gives you ideas on visualizing your data in new ways ~ Create a calculated field in a query: …
Suggested Courses

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question