Solved

Missing Join Predicate

Posted on 2011-09-28
4
901 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
I get a missing join predicate warning when I run a simplet single join query with a where clause on the join field.  Both tables fields are indexed.  Is this a false alarm or is there really something that can be done to fix this.  Here is a basic example:

select field1 from table1 t1 inner join table2 t2 on t1.field2 = t2.field2 where t1.field2 = 'myvalue'

It appears to be related to field2 being the join field and the criteria.
0
Comment
Question by:ws11
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 92

Expert Comment

by:Patrick Matthews
ID: 36717422
The query looks OK to me, other than I would specify, in the select clause, either t1.field1 or t2.field1 (depending on which table you are drawing from).

There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the same column in the FROM clause and in the WHERE clause.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ws11
ID: 36717529
I was surprised that this was an issue.  I thought this might indicate that the indexing is a problem.  One thing that is different is that in one table the width is greater for field1 than the other table.  varchar(50) to varchar(40).

They are large tables though and I don't want any random side effects.
0
 
LVL 41

Accepted Solution

by:
ralmada earned 250 total points
ID: 36717550
>>Is this a false alarm or is there really something that can be done to fix this.<<

I would say it's a false alarm, most likely a bug in the optimizer. Having said that can also try:

select t1.field1 from table1 t1 inner join table2 t2 on t1.field2 = t2.field2 and t1.field2 = 'myvalue'


Also check this link discussing the warning message on SQL 2008:
http://www.scarydba.com/2009/09/15/no-join-predicate/
0
 

Author Comment

by:ws11
ID: 36718008
Yes that took care of it by putting the criteria in the join with the exception to one and I am trying to determine why it is different.  If I use two fields to join it is fine but a single can be more frustrating in this case.  This may be due to the other indexes on one of the join tables.
0

Featured Post

SharePoint Admin?

Enable Your Employees To Focus On The Core With Intuitive Onscreen Guidance That is With You At The Moment of Need.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Naughty Me. While I was changing the database name from DB1 to DB_PROD1 (yep it's not real database name ^v^), I changed the database name and notified my application fellows that I did it. They turn on the application, and everything is working. A …
This article explains how to reset the password of the sa account on a Microsoft SQL Server.  The steps in this article work in SQL 2005, 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2014 and 2016.
There are cases when e.g. an IT administrator wants to have full access and view into selected mailboxes on Exchange server, directly from his own email account in Outlook or Outlook Web Access. This proves useful when for example administrator want…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …

724 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question