Solved

SAN (HP p2000) connection to ESX hosts

Posted on 2011-09-28
4
921 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
Greetings,

my p2000 has dual controllers each with (2) iSCSI ports. I have (2) open NICs on each of my (2) ESX hosts. is there any benefit to running them through switches (two switches on separate subnets) rather than just connecting directly between the hosts and the SAN? one host NIC to one p2000 controller and the other host NIC to the other p2000 controller, for redundancy of course. My current SANs (AX4-5i and a Promise VessRaid) run through these switches.

thanks a lot
0
Comment
Question by:rpliner
4 Comments
 
LVL 10

Assisted Solution

by:ienaxxx
ienaxxx earned 50 total points
ID: 36720079
just scalability, imho
0
 
LVL 119

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 100 total points
ID: 36720197
if will give you multipathing and redundancy.
0
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:Neil Russell
Neil Russell earned 100 total points
ID: 36720210
Multipathing being the big advantage
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
shahravish earned 250 total points
ID: 36815531
It would definately be beneficial to run them on 2 seperate switches and subnets! This gives you full mesh design for multipathing and redundancy and protects you from single point of failures.
Taking the following components - SAN ( 2 X Controller + 2 X Ports), 2 Switches, 2 NICS per host
C= Controller, P = Port, S = Switch, H = Host

C1P1 -> S1P1
C1P2 -> S2P1
C2P1 -> S2P2
C2P2 -> S1P2

H1P1 -> S1P3
H1P2 -> S2P3
H2P1 -> S2P4
H2P2 -> S1P4

This would give you protection against (and I know  many say this is unlikely) but if you had a controller failure and the opposite switch failure, you would still have your paths active and access to SAN available. Certain SAN devices however are not able to have different subnets defined in a single controller, so it may be worth checking, But since you mentioned HP, I am confident it has that support. We deploy mostly HP SAN's and configure the same way.


Adding a switch to the mix also provides you scalability to add more hosts in the future. But mainly, wqith only 1 host, you still have 4 paths. If you connect directly, you will only have 2 paths, where if 1 controller failed, and the second nic failed, you have no SAN access.

Hope this helped. If you have any questions, do let me know

Thanks
0

Featured Post

Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

In this article, I will show you HOW TO: Install VMware Tools for Windows on a VMware Windows virtual machine on a VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5) Host Server, using the VMware Host Client. The virtual machine has Windows Server 2016 instal…
The business world is becoming increasingly integrated with tech. It’s not just for a select few anymore — but what about if you have a small business? It may be easier than you think to integrate technology into your small business, and it’s likely…
Teach the user how to configure vSphere Replication and how to protect and recover VMs Open vSphere Web Client: Verify vsphere Replication is enabled: Enable vSphere Replication for a virtual machine: Verify replicated VM is created: Recover replica…
Teach the user how to install and configure the vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance Open vSphere Web Client: Deploy vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance OVA file: Verify vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance boots successfully: Connect to the …

839 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question