Solved

SAN (HP p2000) connection to ESX hosts

Posted on 2011-09-28
4
930 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
Greetings,

my p2000 has dual controllers each with (2) iSCSI ports. I have (2) open NICs on each of my (2) ESX hosts. is there any benefit to running them through switches (two switches on separate subnets) rather than just connecting directly between the hosts and the SAN? one host NIC to one p2000 controller and the other host NIC to the other p2000 controller, for redundancy of course. My current SANs (AX4-5i and a Promise VessRaid) run through these switches.

thanks a lot
0
Comment
Question by:rpliner
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 10

Assisted Solution

by:ienaxxx
ienaxxx earned 50 total points
ID: 36720079
just scalability, imho
0
 
LVL 121

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 100 total points
ID: 36720197
if will give you multipathing and redundancy.
0
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:Neil Russell
Neil Russell earned 100 total points
ID: 36720210
Multipathing being the big advantage
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
shahravish earned 250 total points
ID: 36815531
It would definately be beneficial to run them on 2 seperate switches and subnets! This gives you full mesh design for multipathing and redundancy and protects you from single point of failures.
Taking the following components - SAN ( 2 X Controller + 2 X Ports), 2 Switches, 2 NICS per host
C= Controller, P = Port, S = Switch, H = Host

C1P1 -> S1P1
C1P2 -> S2P1
C2P1 -> S2P2
C2P2 -> S1P2

H1P1 -> S1P3
H1P2 -> S2P3
H2P1 -> S2P4
H2P2 -> S1P4

This would give you protection against (and I know  many say this is unlikely) but if you had a controller failure and the opposite switch failure, you would still have your paths active and access to SAN available. Certain SAN devices however are not able to have different subnets defined in a single controller, so it may be worth checking, But since you mentioned HP, I am confident it has that support. We deploy mostly HP SAN's and configure the same way.


Adding a switch to the mix also provides you scalability to add more hosts in the future. But mainly, wqith only 1 host, you still have 4 paths. If you connect directly, you will only have 2 paths, where if 1 controller failed, and the second nic failed, you have no SAN access.

Hope this helped. If you have any questions, do let me know

Thanks
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article we will learn how to backup a VMware farm using Nakivo Backup & Replication. In this tutorial we will install the software on a Windows 2012 R2 Server.
Ransomware is a malware that is again in the list of security  concerns. Not only for companies, but also for Government security and  even at personal use. IT departments should be aware and have the right  knowledge to how to fight it.
Teach the user how to rename, unmount, delete and upgrade VMFS datastores. Open vSphere Web Client: Rename VMFS and NFS datastores: Upgrade VMFS-3 volume to VMFS-5: Unmount VMFS datastore: Delete a VMFS datastore:
Teach the user how to configure vSphere Replication and how to protect and recover VMs Open vSphere Web Client: Verify vsphere Replication is enabled: Enable vSphere Replication for a virtual machine: Verify replicated VM is created: Recover replica…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question