• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 540
  • Last Modified:

should i use pagp

I have a 2 switch stack and both have a fiber trunk link back to there own 6500 running in vss.  I currently have them configured with "channel-group 15 mode on" which appear to be working fine.  My question is when I run the command for port-channnel info.  I get unknown protocol.  Am I missing something? Should I be running it in pagp? If so how? Or should I run it as lacp? If so how? Benefits? Disadvanages?
0
glpro76
Asked:
glpro76
  • 2
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
eeRootCommented:
PAGP will have a faster fail over then LACP.  But PAGP is a Cisco only protocol, and should not be used to connect to non-Cisco switches.  If you have only Cisco switches, you can set them to use PAGP with these commands.

channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 15 mode desirable
0
 
glpro76Author Commented:
is there a way to change from what I'm currently running to pagp without interrupting service?
0
 
SouljaCommented:
I would leave it as is. There's no true advantage of running a port channel protocol over having static channels.
0
 
SouljaCommented:
If anything you add extra overhead because you would then be adding the protocol traffic onto your etherchannel link.
0
 
eeRootCommented:
If you switch from LACP to PAGP, there is usually a 5 - 10 second outage as the switch ports come back up
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Cloud Class® Course: MCSA MCSE Windows Server 2012

This course teaches how to install and configure Windows Server 2012 R2.  It is the first step on your path to becoming a Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE).

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now