Solved

sever 2011 terminal server / RDS  running exchange

Posted on 2011-09-30
5
369 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-02
im trying to have 1 server that basically does everything, everything being AD , exchange , Dns , dhcp and a temrinal server with people using it with office

is there any issues / complications to making 1 server do everything?  
0
Comment
Question by:TechGuy_007
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:TechGuy_007
ID: 36892457
sorry its for server 2011 standard
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:jrwarren
ID: 36892485
Small Business Server 2011 performs these features by nature.
   As of this writing, I do not believe Server 2011 is available, unless you refer to Home Server 2011.

SBS 2011

0
 
LVL 41

Expert Comment

by:Adam Brown
ID: 36892624
SBS 2011 is available and has been for some time now. The limitation there is that you are only allowed 75 users/devices on the network if you have SBS 2011. It should also be noted that Remote Desktop Services won't install on a single SBS server. You have to have an additional server if you want Remote Desktop Services on your network with SBS.

If you don't want SBS, yes, it is *possible* to install all that on a single server. It just isn't a good idea to do so for a number of technical reasons. If you were to build a server that utilized VMWare or Hyper-V, it would be more secure to do so and you would overcome some of the technical issues, but also a bit more expensive.
0
 
LVL 41

Accepted Solution

by:
Adam Brown earned 500 total points
ID: 36892684
For a couple of specific reasons why it's not such a good idea to install everything on the same server, Exchange has some issues when it's installed on a Domain Controller. In particular, DCPromo is not supported in that configuration, and Exchange is a resource hog. It tends to use up all the available memory and can bog down a domain controller and slow things down considerably. RDS on a domain controller is a problem because you really really don't want to have regular users logging in to your domain controller. Even more so you don't want them getting into and *exchange* server with RDP. Unless you can get a really hefty server and virtualize each piece of what you want, you're much better off getting multiple servers to handle these roles.
0
 

Author Comment

by:TechGuy_007
ID: 36892733
Arc i completely agree with you , just needed verification
0

Featured Post

Free NetCrunch network monitor licenses!

Only on Experts-Exchange: Sign-up for a free-trial and we'll send you your permanent license!

Here is what you get: 30 Nodes | Unlimited Sensors | No Time Restrictions | Absolutely FREE!

Act now. This offer ends July 14, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

After hours on line I found a solution which pointed to the inherited Active Directory permissions . You have to give/allow permissions to the "Exchange trusted subsystem" for the user in the Active Directory...
Group policies can be applied selectively to specific devices with the help of groups. Utilising this, it is possible to phase-in group policies, over a period of time, by randomly adding non-members user or computers at a set interval, to a group f…
This video discusses moving either the default database or any database to a new volume.
Are you ready to implement Active Directory best practices without reading 300+ pages? You're in luck. In this webinar hosted by Skyport Systems, you gain insight into Microsoft's latest comprehensive guide, with tips on the best and easiest way…

696 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question