?
Solved

sever 2011 terminal server / RDS  running exchange

Posted on 2011-09-30
5
Medium Priority
?
376 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-02
im trying to have 1 server that basically does everything, everything being AD , exchange , Dns , dhcp and a temrinal server with people using it with office

is there any issues / complications to making 1 server do everything?  
0
Comment
Question by:TechGuy_007
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:TechGuy_007
ID: 36892457
sorry its for server 2011 standard
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:jrwarren
ID: 36892485
Small Business Server 2011 performs these features by nature.
   As of this writing, I do not believe Server 2011 is available, unless you refer to Home Server 2011.

SBS 2011

0
 
LVL 44

Expert Comment

by:Adam Brown
ID: 36892624
SBS 2011 is available and has been for some time now. The limitation there is that you are only allowed 75 users/devices on the network if you have SBS 2011. It should also be noted that Remote Desktop Services won't install on a single SBS server. You have to have an additional server if you want Remote Desktop Services on your network with SBS.

If you don't want SBS, yes, it is *possible* to install all that on a single server. It just isn't a good idea to do so for a number of technical reasons. If you were to build a server that utilized VMWare or Hyper-V, it would be more secure to do so and you would overcome some of the technical issues, but also a bit more expensive.
0
 
LVL 44

Accepted Solution

by:
Adam Brown earned 2000 total points
ID: 36892684
For a couple of specific reasons why it's not such a good idea to install everything on the same server, Exchange has some issues when it's installed on a Domain Controller. In particular, DCPromo is not supported in that configuration, and Exchange is a resource hog. It tends to use up all the available memory and can bog down a domain controller and slow things down considerably. RDS on a domain controller is a problem because you really really don't want to have regular users logging in to your domain controller. Even more so you don't want them getting into and *exchange* server with RDP. Unless you can get a really hefty server and virtualize each piece of what you want, you're much better off getting multiple servers to handle these roles.
0
 

Author Comment

by:TechGuy_007
ID: 36892733
Arc i completely agree with you , just needed verification
0

Featured Post

Become an Android App Developer

Ready to kick start your career in 2018? Learn how to build an Android app in January’s Course of the Month and open the door to new opportunities.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Sometimes it necessary to set special permissions on user objects.  For instance when using a Blackberry server, the SendAs permission needs to be set. I see many admins struggle with the setting that permission only to see it disappear within a few…
Upgrading from older Exchange server to the latest Exchange server can be tiresome, error-prone and risky, without being a seasoned exchange server administrators. It can become even problematic if you're an organization that runs on tight timeline…
This Micro Tutorial hows how you can integrate  Mac OSX to a Windows Active Directory Domain. Apple has made it easy to allow users to bind their macs to a windows domain with relative ease. The following video show how to bind OSX Mavericks to …
A short tutorial showing how to set up an email signature in Outlook on the Web (previously known as OWA). For free email signatures designs, visit https://www.mail-signatures.com/articles/signature-templates/?sts=6651 If you want to manage em…
Suggested Courses

621 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question