sever 2011 terminal server / RDS running exchange

im trying to have 1 server that basically does everything, everything being AD , exchange , Dns , dhcp and a temrinal server with people using it with office

is there any issues / complications to making 1 server do everything?  
TechGuy_007Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

TechGuy_007Author Commented:
sorry its for server 2011 standard
0
jrwarrenCommented:
Small Business Server 2011 performs these features by nature.
   As of this writing, I do not believe Server 2011 is available, unless you refer to Home Server 2011.

SBS 2011

0
Adam BrownSr Solutions ArchitectCommented:
SBS 2011 is available and has been for some time now. The limitation there is that you are only allowed 75 users/devices on the network if you have SBS 2011. It should also be noted that Remote Desktop Services won't install on a single SBS server. You have to have an additional server if you want Remote Desktop Services on your network with SBS.

If you don't want SBS, yes, it is *possible* to install all that on a single server. It just isn't a good idea to do so for a number of technical reasons. If you were to build a server that utilized VMWare or Hyper-V, it would be more secure to do so and you would overcome some of the technical issues, but also a bit more expensive.
0
Adam BrownSr Solutions ArchitectCommented:
For a couple of specific reasons why it's not such a good idea to install everything on the same server, Exchange has some issues when it's installed on a Domain Controller. In particular, DCPromo is not supported in that configuration, and Exchange is a resource hog. It tends to use up all the available memory and can bog down a domain controller and slow things down considerably. RDS on a domain controller is a problem because you really really don't want to have regular users logging in to your domain controller. Even more so you don't want them getting into and *exchange* server with RDP. Unless you can get a really hefty server and virtualize each piece of what you want, you're much better off getting multiple servers to handle these roles.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
TechGuy_007Author Commented:
Arc i completely agree with you , just needed verification
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Server OS

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.