To Stack or Not To Stack

Posted on 2011-10-19
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
I don't handle any of the network gear at my work, only the Voip equipment.  While talking over a new network design with one of the "network" guys for a new location, I asked him why he isn't just stacking the 3750s and 2960s that are going into the location.  He never answered me, despite all the switches ordered are the stackable kind.   I cannot think of any technical reasons to NOT stack them, but it isn't really my forte (despite doing so in a previous position).

Can anyone think of any technical reasons (i.e. Cons) to stacking these switches? Or possible a best practice from Cisco showing they prefer stacking/no stacking them?

Thanks for helping my understanding of this!!!
Question by:sr75

Assisted Solution

Mexile earned 668 total points
ID: 36997138
The only cons that may crop up is if the stack master fails or if there is a ios bug.
For failure, the stack undergoes master election and continues working with very little downtime and no loss of current configuration. you will have only lost the ports on that one physical switch. A problem may be experienced if you have different ios feature sets on the other switches - ensure you are running identical feature sets on all switches and this won't be an issue.

If there is some sort of ios bug, because the switch is one logical entity, it affects all switches within the stack. This then comes back to a reload or ios upgrade, depending on what is needed to correct the issue.

Verdict: - stack them.

imho, the benefits outweigh the risks.
LVL 10

Assisted Solution

ampranti earned 664 total points
ID: 36998060
You should stack them!
As the "network guys" are outsource (from what I can understand) , request to stack them!
There are only cons for stacking them!! You can manage switches as a single big one, you have higher throughput than two or three portchannel ports, less changes to have a problem with a cable and a few more ports!!!


Accepted Solution

jigardave earned 668 total points
ID: 36998568
- Single logical switch to maintain instead of managing each switches separately. Single IP addressing for interface, vlans... single DNS name
- Ease of provisioning of new switches --> If you have a remote site and at that place you need to add/replace switch in the stack then stacking is good compared to not stacking. As you can push IOS and configuration from master switch. With not stacking you may need to find ways of establishing connectivity with new switch and then upload IOS and configuration or provide configuration to on-site technician who may not be from your company.
- 2960 - 10G/20G - 3750 - 32G/64G - higher throughput with stack cable fully connected

- IOS must be identical on each member switch so if you have only purchased one switch with EMI(Enhance multilayer image) and other switches are ipbase-SMI(Standard Multilayer Image) then you need to pay extra(to run EMI on all rest of the switches) to Vendor if you want to stack them with EMI feaure or you get SMI.
whereas with not stacking you can have one switch with EMI others with SMI.
- With 3750s We have been in a situation where one switch failed and for some reason every switch in stack re-booted(without any power event) but I believe that is very uncommon
- Little bit of staff training on stacking if not used before

Stacking is prefered way.
LVL 15

Author Comment

ID: 37000446
Thanks everyone!!!  That is what I thought, I just wanted to make sure I was not crazy suggesting they be stacked because he apparently was really offended by the suggestion.

Mexile - Thanks for the Document!!!

Ampranti - our network guys are internal actually.

jigardave - had that same thing happen to me in a previous job.
LVL 15

Author Closing Comment

ID: 37000458
Thanks for proving to me I am not  that crazy!

Featured Post

Put Machine Learning to Work--Protect Your Clients

Machine learning means Smarter Cybersecurity™ Solutions.
As technology continues to advance, managing and analyzing massive data sets just can’t be accomplished by humans alone. It requires huge amounts of memory and storage, as well as the high-speed power of the cloud.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In the world of WAN, QoS is a pretty important topic for most, if not all, networks. Some WAN technologies have QoS mechanisms built in, but others, such as some L2 WAN's, don't have QoS control in the provider cloud.
In this article, we’ll look at how to deploy ProxySQL.
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…
Suggested Courses

862 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question