Solved

# How to summarize routes

Posted on 2011-10-19
Medium Priority
759 Views
Hi,

Can you provide an easy way to summarize routes?

How would you summarize these?

172.1.4.0/25
172.1.4.128/25
172.1.5.0/24
172.1.6.0/24
172.1.7.0/24

I need a method I can use on exam day.  Can't seem to wrap my mind around it.  If you can detail step by step maybe it will help.
0
Question by:dmwynne
• 6
• 4

LVL 7

Expert Comment

ID: 36998104
To summarized these you need two bits which gives you posibilities:
00
01
10
11

.4 in binary = 0000 0100
.5 in binary = 0000 0101
.6 in binary = 0000 0110
.7 in binary = 0000 0111

You see that the first six bits never change from .4 to .7 so you can summarize at .4 with 22 bits
172.1.4.0/22

0

LVL 29

Accepted Solution

pwindell earned 2000 total points
ID: 37001930
I don't mess with binary.  It is too easy to figure out in decimal

4 to 7 is a span of 4 segments,...so....

256-4=252

So the mask is 255.255.252.0

172.1.4.0  (255.255.252.0)

Unfortunately if this is a private LAN this is not an RFC Private range.  The RFC Private Range in this Class run from 172.16.0.0 through 172.31.255.255
0

LVL 14

Author Comment

ID: 37003988
How would you summarize:

10.1.1.0 /30
10.1.1.4/30
10.1.1.8 /30
10.1.2.0 /23
10.1.4.0 /24
10.1.5.0 /25
0

LVL 29

Expert Comment

ID: 37006161
You can't.
Not cleanly anyway.
0

LVL 29

Expert Comment

ID: 37006167
That's why networks need good planning before designing so that proper route summarization can be done.  Even with proper planning it may never come out perfect.
0

LVL 7

Expert Comment

ID: 37007618
Of course you can summarize this! There are no statement in the question that the network is discontiguous. If the networks do not have any 10.X.X.X addresses anywhere else in the topology the summarization gets an easy 10.0.0.0/8. If the question states summarize with the longest mask possible with one summary then you will get 10.1.0.0/21 with three āborrowedā bits. This gets a summary from 10.1.0.0 to 10.1.7.255.

If the question states that addresses from 10.1.6.0 and up may be in other networks then we can make two summaries to shorten the routing table:
10.1.0.0/22
10.1.4.0/23

But never say that you canāt summarize without nowing all the facts and also never summarize without nowing all the facts.

0

LVL 29

Expert Comment

ID: 37007748
Oh, common'
Of course it is discontinuous:

10.1.1.2/30 is missing
10.1.1.6/30 is missing
10.1.1.10 through 255 is missing

The only way you can cleanly summarize 10.1.2.0 /23, 10.1.4.0 /24, 10.1.5.0 /25 would be to include 10.1.5.128/25 and 10.1.6.0/24.  In which case you could use 10.1.2.0 mask 255.255.252.0.   But 10.1.5.128/25 and 10.1.6.0/24 is in fact missing so you cannot summarize it that way cleanly.

If you summarize segments into your summarization that do not actually exist you can have issues if those segment come into play elsewhere over different paths.
Now if you do not care about doing that,..then yes you can use 10.0.0.0/8 or 10.1.0.0/21, of course. I do that myself with ours by using 192.168.0.0/16 even though I don't actually use all 256 segments,..but I do so with the full knowledge that I may have to change that later.

So I am answering the question exactly literally based on what was literally listed on the list.   I even ended it with the qualification of "not cleaning anyway" and that is exactly true.

0

LVL 7

Expert Comment

ID: 37007790
I agree with you but not with the answer "you can't"
Like I said it depends on the design and gather all the  facts without guessing...
0

LVL 29

Expert Comment

ID: 37007851
I agree with you but not with the answer "you can't"

Well,..that was not the answer I gave,...the answer I gave was "You can't. Not cleanly anyway"

You sure you're not just trying to "one up" me because I gave a different original answer to the original question than you did? The original question was "Can you provide an easy way to summarize routes?"  I took note of the term "easy way" and told them to forget the binary and do it the quick easy method where you only deal with the decimal numbers,...which is a lot easier and does fine in most situations.  I'm just trying to answer what the guy asked in the context he asked it,...that's all.
0

LVL 7

Expert Comment

ID: 37008222
I sorry I didn't mean to "up you"... but we experts must check and validate each others answers and this time I did not agree with you and I had to point that out.

But I agree with your first answer, it is clean (and notice my finger here ;-) ) and you can count like that IF you understand the rules that governs summarization/subnetting. I'm a certified instructor in these mather and you can't guess to how subnetting often look when the students do not understand the binaries that lines beneath and tries your method - big FAIL. But of course, I also uses it!
0

LVL 29

Expert Comment

ID: 37008273
I understand. No problem.  :-)
I'm not an instructor, but am on the IT Advisory Committee at a local college.

I still refer back to binary on some things but I built some spreadsheets that shows all the logic in Decimal to make it easier.  I don't use IP Calculators because I always want to force myself to think it through and understand what I am really doing.
0

## Featured Post

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

WARNING: Ā  If you follow the instructions here, you will wipe out your VTP and VLAN configurations. Ā Make sure you have backed up your switch!!! I recently had some issues with a few low-end Cisco routers (RV325) and I opened a case with Cisco TAā¦
This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confiā¦
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sitesā¦
Both in life and business ā not all partnerships are created equal. Spend 30 short minutes with us to learn:   ā¢ Key questions to ask when considering a partnership to accelerate your business into the cloud ā¢ Pitfalls and mistakes other partnersā¦
###### Suggested Courses
Course of the Month15 days, left to enroll

#### 839 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.