?
Solved

Server Clustering Explained

Posted on 2011-10-27
4
Medium Priority
?
462 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
We have a centralised print server management system for 250 network printers.  We have had this on two virtual server (using vmware) and are suffering from poor performance due to the limitations we have on processing.  One server had sql server on it, while the other had the print queues and print management software.

They have recommended we have a server cluster and one node has the SQL server while the other has the print queues and management software.

Can you please explain server clustering and the hardware required and  how it would help?
0
Comment
Question by:WNottsC
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:MrAli
ID: 37041594
From what I just read, it sounds like you have 2 separate physical servers, both running a VMWare Host OS.  In those VMWare hosts, you have a Virtual Windows server.  One Virtual Windows Server is your print server, the other Virtual Windows Server on the other physical machine.

Now, someone (who are 'they'?) is recommending an 'active/active' clustering strategy between those 2.  One cluster actively will host the Windows print server, the other hosts SQL Server.  

IF this is accurate, and please let us know if it is not and clarify, then my suggestion would be to ask 'them' if they ever actually did Active/Active clustering.  Do they realize that in fact, you have to have enough cpu/ram on each node to handle BOTH servers at peak usage?  If your print server fails, it will failover to the SQL Instance.  Your print server is already pegged at high CPU usage anyways, and if this failover happens during peak hours, will your SQL server be able to handle the additional work load?  So far, this sounds like a nightmare.  Not only will 1 service go down, but when it fails over, then both will go down.  Not good.  If you are set in stone to do Active/Active clustering, you need a 3rd node as a passive one at a minimum.  Not good architecture it seems.

Please give us an update. Thanks.
0
 

Author Comment

by:WNottsC
ID: 37041697
I am sorry to be so unclear I am trying to get my head round it at the moment.

A little more information:-

We have an external print company in to help implement there Print Management software, as part of this we are having to make sure all our printers are networked (as you would expect) and that they are all using the HP Universal PS Print Driver.  This causes enough of a headache in itself, using the PS driver causes documents that used to print with the PCL driver to take along time to spool and at times not print at all.  These I think are a combination of printer server resources and lack of memory on the printers them selves.

We are currently using VMware to manage out virtual machines.  We have 4 host servers at the moment each with 2 quad core processes and 64GB of memory.  These resources are then shared out among our 40 or so virtual machines.  We have a combination of web, SQL, files, and Application servers.

As mentioned we currently have one virtual machine which has the SQL database for their software and another virtual machine for the management software and the print queues.  

The company we have providing the print management software have suggested that the poor performance we are getting where the CPU usages of the 2nd virtual machines (print monitoring and print queues) are maxing out at 100% will be fixed by moving towards two physical machines in a cluster.  They have not talked about the type of cluster (active/Active or Active/ passive) just that one node would be the database server and one would hold their management software and I assume the Print Queues.
0
 
LVL 7

Accepted Solution

by:
MrAli earned 2000 total points
ID: 37041762
Hi WNottsC,

No problem, I fall into the same habits of forgetting some info myself when asking for help.  

So if they are saying 'create a cluster using only physical servers, put sql server on 1 node of the cluster and the print management software on the other', then they mean an 'active/active' configuration.  

If the SQL Server has no resource issues, and there's good ways of checking if there are or not, then there's no need to put it on the new physical cluster.  If the SQL Server is not resource intensive at all, then you could without worrying too much, but it sucks if you do, because you have to pay lisencing for both nodes and get enterprise (SQL Std works with 2 node active/passive clustering only, need enterprise for more and sql std clustering is full of troubles) which will cost tons of money.  

I'd say this, if I got everything right:
do a proof of concept.  Test their app on non-vm hardware, see how well their app works.  If it works very well then do active/passive clustering, save the licensing costs.   Does this company have some hardware they can throw your way to test it on?  Perhaps your company has some server they can use to test.
0
 

Author Comment

by:WNottsC
ID: 37043188
We are an education so luckily for us the licences are dirt cheap :)

I am not sure on the SQLl server and if it is having any resource issues it may be fine to leave where it is and as you said have the print queues and software on an active/passive setup

Thanks for all your help

0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

More or less everybody in the IT market understands the basics of Networking, however when we start talking about Storage Networks, things get a bit dizzier, and this is where I would like to help.
Data center, now-a-days, is referred as the home of all the advanced technologies. In-fact, most of the businesses are now establishing their entire organizational structure around the IT capabilities.
In this video, Percona Director of Solution Engineering Jon Tobin discusses the function and features of Percona Server for MongoDB. How Percona can help Percona can help you determine if Percona Server for MongoDB is the right solution for …
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…
Suggested Courses

749 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question