bricar1
asked on
"An attempt to resolve the DNS name of a domain controller in the domain being joined has failed."
Everytime I tried to join the domain I get this error message. The client computer is windows 7
An attempt to resolve the DNS name of a domain controller in the domain being joined has failed. Please verify this client is configured to reacha DNS server that can resolve DNS names in the target domain. For information about the newtork troubleshooting see windows help.
Windows 7 Pro
Server 2003 Standard 192.168.1.99
Router 192.168.10.1
Firewalls disabled
IPV6 Disabled
ipconfig /all:
ipv4: 192.168.1.5 (preferred)
SN Mask 255.255.255.0
Default GW 192.168.10.1
DHCP Server: 192.168.10.99
DNS Servers: 192.168.10.99
Primary WINS Server: 192.168.10.99
NetBIOS over TCP: Enabled
ipconfig /flushdns - successfull
ipconfig /registerdns:
The requested operation requiresw elevation
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm at the customer's office and I'm under the gun time-wise.
An attempt to resolve the DNS name of a domain controller in the domain being joined has failed. Please verify this client is configured to reacha DNS server that can resolve DNS names in the target domain. For information about the newtork troubleshooting see windows help.
Windows 7 Pro
Server 2003 Standard 192.168.1.99
Router 192.168.10.1
Firewalls disabled
IPV6 Disabled
ipconfig /all:
ipv4: 192.168.1.5 (preferred)
SN Mask 255.255.255.0
Default GW 192.168.10.1
DHCP Server: 192.168.10.99
DNS Servers: 192.168.10.99
Primary WINS Server: 192.168.10.99
NetBIOS over TCP: Enabled
ipconfig /flushdns - successfull
ipconfig /registerdns:
The requested operation requiresw elevation
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm at the customer's office and I'm under the gun time-wise.
First of all: why do you have 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/(I suppose 24) with a Router that does not make sense at all?
ASKER
Typo. Brain is fried.
192.168.10.5 (Preferred)
192.168.10.5 (Preferred)
ASKER
And server is 192.168.10.99
This is your scenario: Client (10.5/24) and Server (10.99/24) are on the same NET. Client uses the Server for DNS which is mandatory for AD. I don't see any issue.
Do you confirm there is only 1 AD DC?
Do you confirm it is 10.99/24?
Do you confirm there is only 1 AD DC?
Do you confirm it is 10.99/24?
ASKER
Everything you've typed is confirmed.
1 single AD DC
DC is 10.99/24
Client is 10.5/24 (though I've tried forcing other addresses)
I inherited this network a few weeks agao, but last week I successfully joined an XP Pro client to the domain. There is also a Win2K connected, believe it or not.
This is the first attempt at joining a Win7 Pro machine to this particular domain. It seems that Win 7 is being fussy about something in the configuration, but I can't figure it out.
BTW, the client can ping the router and DC with no problem.
1 single AD DC
DC is 10.99/24
Client is 10.5/24 (though I've tried forcing other addresses)
I inherited this network a few weeks agao, but last week I successfully joined an XP Pro client to the domain. There is also a Win2K connected, believe it or not.
This is the first attempt at joining a Win7 Pro machine to this particular domain. It seems that Win 7 is being fussy about something in the configuration, but I can't figure it out.
BTW, the client can ping the router and DC with no problem.
I understand you are unable to join Client to the Domain. Which result do you obtain from PING SERVERNAME (from Client, of course)? What if you run NSLOOKUP SERVERNAME?
ASKER
ping server yields expected 4 replies.
ping 192.168.10.99 yields expected 4 replies.
nslookup server yields:
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.10.99
*** UnKnown can't find server: Server failed
ping 192.168.10.99 yields expected 4 replies.
nslookup server yields:
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.10.99
*** UnKnown can't find server: Server failed
Take a look at DNS on Server. Is there any A Record (also known as HOST) for server? We are driving in the right direction...
ASKER
I think you mean in the Forward lookup zone, correct?
There is no A Record for the server in either Forward or Reverse zones.
There is no A Record for the server in either Forward or Reverse zones.
This is the reason. Create an A Record for server. Rerun NSLOOKUP SERVER on the client. If it runs OK, you should join the client to the Domain. Waiting for your feedback. Thank you.
ASKER
This is uncharted territory for me.
Structure:
Server
 Forward Lookup Zones
 _msdcs.ccs.local
  dc
   sites
    etc.
Created new A Record in _msdcs.ccs.local
Tried Name: server
also tried name: [Blank] (Uses parent domain name if blank)
FQDN is unchangeable at -msdcs.ccs.local
IP address is 192.168.10.99
Creat associated pointer is checked.
With both names tried, an nslookuip on client yields:
*** server._msdcs.ccs.local can't find server: Server failed
I understand I might be doing this completely wrong as I've never had to create an A Record before.
Â
Structure:
Server
 Forward Lookup Zones
 _msdcs.ccs.local
  dc
   sites
    etc.
Created new A Record in _msdcs.ccs.local
Tried Name: server
also tried name: [Blank] (Uses parent domain name if blank)
FQDN is unchangeable at -msdcs.ccs.local
IP address is 192.168.10.99
Creat associated pointer is checked.
With both names tried, an nslookuip on client yields:
*** server._msdcs.ccs.local can't find server: Server failed
I understand I might be doing this completely wrong as I've never had to create an A Record before.
Â
ASKER
I see in DNS Event log a lot of Event ID 800:
Description:
The zone <zone> is configured to accept updates but the A record for the primary server in the zone's SOA record is not available on this DNS server. This may indicate a configuration problem. If the address of the primary server for the zone cannot be resolved DNS clients will be unable to locate a server to accept updates for this zone. This will cause DNS clients to be unable to perform DNS updates.
I went into SOa, saw the server there with no address listed. I added 192.168.10.99, but still no luck on the nslookup, hoever SOA is set to refresh every 15 minutes. I wonder if I have to wait for refresh.
Description:
The zone <zone> is configured to accept updates but the A record for the primary server in the zone's SOA record is not available on this DNS server. This may indicate a configuration problem. If the address of the primary server for the zone cannot be resolved DNS clients will be unable to locate a server to accept updates for this zone. This will cause DNS clients to be unable to perform DNS updates.
I went into SOa, saw the server there with no address listed. I added 192.168.10.99, but still no luck on the nslookup, hoever SOA is set to refresh every 15 minutes. I wonder if I have to wait for refresh.
ASKER
strivoli,
I've got to get out of here. I'm going to study up overnight and attack it again on Friday. Clearly we're on the right track but my knowledge is lacking in this area and I'll brush up what I can tonight and tomorrow and hopefully come back in fully armed to fix the issue. I'm sure you would have it fixed in 3 seconds were you present.
Thanks for the help. I'd truly appreciate it if you'd keep an eye on this thread just in case I have a question or two.
Thanks. Your efforts are appreciated.
I've got to get out of here. I'm going to study up overnight and attack it again on Friday. Clearly we're on the right track but my knowledge is lacking in this area and I'll brush up what I can tonight and tomorrow and hopefully come back in fully armed to fix the issue. I'm sure you would have it fixed in 3 seconds were you present.
Thanks for the help. I'd truly appreciate it if you'd keep an eye on this thread just in case I have a question or two.
Thanks. Your efforts are appreciated.
You are Welcome! I'm quite busy now but I can give you some instructions tomorrow morning (means about 24 hours from now). If you can give me feedback immediately (tomorrow morning) I'd appreciate and it would repay my efforts (not to mention that we could get rid of this issue). Bye.
ASKER
The company won't even be open till noon (their emplyees will be working from home) and I may not be able to get there till late.
Is there any way you can give me a run-down of creating an A Record properly, particulary exactly where in the structure it should reside, and what settings should be selected?
I know that's difficult if you're not sitting in front of the particular machine, but I'm asking just in case it's something that is somewhat standardized.
I'm not sure if I'll even be able to get into the facility today, but I do have to resolve it by Monday the latest, so I'll report back here as things unfold. Thanks again for you help. It really is greatly appreciated.
Is there any way you can give me a run-down of creating an A Record properly, particulary exactly where in the structure it should reside, and what settings should be selected?
I know that's difficult if you're not sitting in front of the particular machine, but I'm asking just in case it's something that is somewhat standardized.
I'm not sure if I'll even be able to get into the facility today, but I do have to resolve it by Monday the latest, so I'll report back here as things unfold. Thanks again for you help. It really is greatly appreciated.
ASKER
Awesome, thank you.
Are there issues with delays (ie. needing to wait X amount of time for server's new A Record to be able to process the client's request to join), or are reboots required (Server and/or client)?
You're the BEST, man. Thank you. I'll remote in over the weekend to create the record, and on Mondy I'll be onsite and attempt the rejoin.
Is there a way to award more points than the initial 500 for exemplary work?
Are there issues with delays (ie. needing to wait X amount of time for server's new A Record to be able to process the client's request to join), or are reboots required (Server and/or client)?
You're the BEST, man. Thank you. I'll remote in over the weekend to create the record, and on Mondy I'll be onsite and attempt the rejoin.
Is there a way to award more points than the initial 500 for exemplary work?
Thank you for your feedback! No issues, no time to wait to Join after the A Record has being added, no reboots on the server (where you add the Record), client must be rebooted after you have Joined the domain. 500 points are enough but most of all it's your success! Glad to help you. Bye.
ASKER
No joy. The domain is CCS.local, and as you can see, unlike your example, CSS.local doesn't even have any subfolders underneath it.
There is now an A Record pointing to the server both in the CCS folder (as depicted) and also in the
_msdcs.ccs.local folder. Same error message when trying to connect client to domain.
As I said, I inherited this mess and it looks like DNS was not set up right from the start. Any other ideas? Thanks!
Â
There is now an A Record pointing to the server both in the CCS folder (as depicted) and also in the
_msdcs.ccs.local folder. Same error message when trying to connect client to domain.
As I said, I inherited this mess and it looks like DNS was not set up right from the start. Any other ideas? Thanks!
Â
Let me study the situation. I'll be back this afternoon (now it's 12.13). Hope to give you step-by-step instructions. Bye.
ASKER
Again, I thank you for your help.
For what it's worth, I did re-join her old XP client to the domain without any problem at all.
Many thanks!!!
For what it's worth, I did re-join her old XP client to the domain without any problem at all.
Many thanks!!!
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
Create a free account to see this answer
Signing up is free and takes 30 seconds. No credit card required.
ASKER
Wow, thanks for all the effort. I thought it would probably come down to reconfiguring DNS.
I will be doing it either Thursday or Friday. Clearly DNS was set up wrong from the get-go, although XP was very forgiving with the problesms. Not so with Win7.
The videos helped tremendously and I thank you for that. I will be sure to keep you up to date. Much, much appreciated!
Brian
I will be doing it either Thursday or Friday. Clearly DNS was set up wrong from the get-go, although XP was very forgiving with the problesms. Not so with Win7.
The videos helped tremendously and I thank you for that. I will be sure to keep you up to date. Much, much appreciated!
Brian
Hy, did you reconfigure DNS? Did that help? Feedback welcome. Thanks.
ASKER
I spoke with the client on Friday and they said they want to just replace the server with a new one since it's getting old.
I'm quite certain that your solutions are correct. There might have been additional issues, but your instructions were definitely the proper procedure. They helped me to understand DNS much better, and again I truly appreciate the help.
Since they are going to retire the machine (many other issues have popped up before due to their previous tech messing up the setup) they don't want me to continue troubleshooting.
Of course I'm awarding you full points, with many thanks. Is it possible for you to leave the videos up a little while longer? I'd like to watch them a few more times.
Brian
I'm quite certain that your solutions are correct. There might have been additional issues, but your instructions were definitely the proper procedure. They helped me to understand DNS much better, and again I truly appreciate the help.
Since they are going to retire the machine (many other issues have popped up before due to their previous tech messing up the setup) they don't want me to continue troubleshooting.
Of course I'm awarding you full points, with many thanks. Is it possible for you to leave the videos up a little while longer? I'd like to watch them a few more times.
Brian
ASKER
Awesome job. Your sticking with me for several days is much appreciated. I feel I have a better understanding of DNS thanks to you.
You are welcome! I thank you for closing this question anyway even though the co. has decided to retire the server. The videos will remain online. Have a nice time!