Do you wonder if your IT business is truly profitable or if you should raise your prices? Learn how to calculate your overhead burden with our free interactive tool and use it to determine the right price for your IT services. Download your free eBook now!
vlan setup on HP 2910 and 2810
Greetings,
I would like to set up an additional vlan on each of my two switches. One switch is on subnet 50 and the other is on 100. My plan is to add a vlan to each with the others subnet for redundancy (I only have the 2 switches for SAN access for my 2 VMware hosts). I figure if one goes out, I could simply pull the cables from one and connect them to the ports assigned to the vlan of the failed switches subnet (is that right?) I searched and found several docs and other info but I am still confused as to where I do this (telnet or web interface) and also the exact info I need to enter. I want to use ports 13 - 20 on each for the additional vlan.
thanks a lot. step-by-step is ideal, but of course any guidance is much appreciated.
I would like to set up an additional vlan on each of my two switches. One switch is on subnet 50 and the other is on 100. My plan is to add a vlan to each with the others subnet for redundancy (I only have the 2 switches for SAN access for my 2 VMware hosts). I figure if one goes out, I could simply pull the cables from one and connect them to the ports assigned to the vlan of the failed switches subnet (is that right?) I searched and found several docs and other info but I am still confused as to where I do this (telnet or web interface) and also the exact info I need to enter. I want to use ports 13 - 20 on each for the additional vlan.
thanks a lot. step-by-step is ideal, but of course any guidance is much appreciated.
Asked:
Who is Participating?
Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by
Enjoy your complimentary solution view.
Get this solution by purchasing an Individual license!
Start your 7-day free trial.
I wear a lot of hats...
"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.
yes. those ports happen to be open on each switch.
networking screenshot attached (only one host. the other is the same except .11 instead of .12)
I am somewhat comfortable with the cmd line (especially if I have the commands!) it's mainly the trk and tagged / untagged stuff that is confusing me a little.
thanks
vm-net1.pdf
networking screenshot attached (only one host. the other is the same except .11 instead of .12)
I am somewhat comfortable with the cmd line (especially if I have the commands!) it's mainly the trk and tagged / untagged stuff that is confusing me a little.
thanks
vm-net1.pdf
okay, you need to trunk the ports, using static trunking on HP switches, as ESX does not support LACP, and once you have the ports trunked, tag the trunks with the VLANS required.
and then make sure Tags are specified on the network portgroups.
ill get the commands for you
and then make sure Tags are specified on the network portgroups.
ill get the commands for you
easiest way to manage VLANs on these switches is telent into them, type "menu"
Go into port configuration, setup your trunks, then go into VLANs and associate the trunks with the VLANs you want them to have access to. You can setup a LACP trunk between the two switches if you want them to be online at the same time. just keep in mind these switches don't support cross switch trunks so the trunks would have to reside on a per switch basis.
@hanccocka: Hey..just passed my Netapp NCIE..fun stuff with FC switches I have in my lab..
Go into port configuration, setup your trunks, then go into VLANs and associate the trunks with the VLANs you want them to have access to. You can setup a LACP trunk between the two switches if you want them to be online at the same time. just keep in mind these switches don't support cross switch trunks so the trunks would have to reside on a per switch basis.
@hanccocka: Hey..just passed my Netapp NCIE..fun stuff with FC switches I have in my lab..
So looking at your networking, you've got 5 NICs
vSwitch0 - vmnic1
vSwitch1 - vmnic3, vmnic2
vSwitch2 - vmnic4
vSwitch0 - vmnic0
is it vSwitch1 and vSwitch2, and their NICs we are wanting to VLAN?
vSwitch0 - vmnic1
vSwitch1 - vmnic3, vmnic2
vSwitch2 - vmnic4
vSwitch0 - vmnic0
is it vSwitch1 and vSwitch2, and their NICs we are wanting to VLAN?
yes. those are the NICs connected to the SAN. I also have a vmnic6, which is not assigned to any vSwitch but is live and has an IP range in the 100 subnet (192.168.100.19 - 192.168.100.19). I guess I should assign that to vSwitch2 and bind the adapters like vSwitch1.
excuse my ignorance but I thought I would just have to assign the ports I wanted on the switch to a new vlan and then in case one switch went down, I could literally just move the cables from the downed switch to the live one (in the vlan ports of course). I think I am missing something regarding how the vlan gets the IP range I would like it to use. I also didn't realize I would have to do anything to the vnics. but I guess I should have figured they'd need to be tagged (untagged?) in order to be routed properly to the vlan. sorry, thinking out loud and trying to piece this together.
found this link helpful regarding commands but I'm still not sure which order to apply the commands.
http://www.sysadmintutorials.com/tutorials/hp/hp-procurve-advanced-cli-commands-reference/
anyway, thanks again.
excuse my ignorance but I thought I would just have to assign the ports I wanted on the switch to a new vlan and then in case one switch went down, I could literally just move the cables from the downed switch to the live one (in the vlan ports of course). I think I am missing something regarding how the vlan gets the IP range I would like it to use. I also didn't realize I would have to do anything to the vnics. but I guess I should have figured they'd need to be tagged (untagged?) in order to be routed properly to the vlan. sorry, thinking out loud and trying to piece this together.
found this link helpful regarding commands but I'm still not sure which order to apply the commands.
http://www.sysadmintutorials.com/tutorials/hp/hp-procurve-advanced-cli-commands-reference/
anyway, thanks again.
Yes, those are the commands that you require.
You Create the VLAN first, then create the Trunk, and then add the Trunk to the VLAN.
so you would do
Create VLANs
HP-Switch(Config)#Vlan 50 (Creates VLAN 50) for subnet 50
HP-Switch(Config)#Vlan 100 (Creates VLAN 100) for subnet 100
You Create the VLAN first, then create the Trunk, and then add the Trunk to the VLAN.
so you would do
Create VLANs
HP-Switch(Config)#Vlan 50 (Creates VLAN 50) for subnet 50
HP-Switch(Config)#Vlan 100 (Creates VLAN 100) for subnet 100
I will have to search for directions on how to configure the nics on the SAN (AX4-5i). you are saying I will have to reconfigure those as well, correct?
So if I reconfigure the nics on the esx hosts and the san, will that affect the current set up (lose existing connections)?
so, I hope I understand this, but I will have to assign a vlan to the nics on the server, the ports on the switches, and the nics on the san. so it will affect connectivity until all are reconfigured. once they are all reconfigured, each switch will have a vlan for each subnet and the nics on the servers and san will also be configured with their respective vlan. at that point, if one switch goes down, I can move the cables from one switch to the other and it will work because they are configured for the same vlan (server nic, switch ports, san nics).
again excuse my ignorance - didn't think this was going to turn into a vlan lesson.
thanks
So if I reconfigure the nics on the esx hosts and the san, will that affect the current set up (lose existing connections)?
so, I hope I understand this, but I will have to assign a vlan to the nics on the server, the ports on the switches, and the nics on the san. so it will affect connectivity until all are reconfigured. once they are all reconfigured, each switch will have a vlan for each subnet and the nics on the servers and san will also be configured with their respective vlan. at that point, if one switch goes down, I can move the cables from one switch to the other and it will work because they are configured for the same vlan (server nic, switch ports, san nics).
again excuse my ignorance - didn't think this was going to turn into a vlan lesson.
thanks
If this is a PRODUCTION system, and you are going to start re-configuring networking, it's possible you will lose contact with SAN, Network, VMs, just to warn you.
and yes, you will need to configure the physical ports on the switch that also connect to the SAN.
and yes, you will need to configure the physical ports on the switch that also connect to the SAN.
Switch-4108GL#5# config
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 50 - Create VLAN 50
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-50)# VLAN 100 - Create VLAN 100
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 100
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Status and Counters - VLAN Information
Maximum VLANs to support : 8
Primary VLAN : DEFAULT_VLAN
Management VLAN :
802.1Q VLAN ID Name Status
-------------- ------------- -------------
1 DEFAULT_VLAN Static
50 VLAN50 Static
100 VLAN100 Static
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# trunk a13-a14 trk1 - Create TRUNK trk1 (static) no LACP - VMware does not support this!
Switch-4108GL#5(config)#sh
Load Balancing
Port | Name Type | Group Type
---- + --------------------------
A13 | 1000SX | Trk1 Trunk
A14 | 1000SX | Trk1 Trunk
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 50
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-50)# tagged Trk1
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-50)# exit
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 100
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# show vlan ports Trk1
Status and Counters - VLAN Information - for ports Trk1
802.1Q VLAN ID Name Status
-------------- ------------- -------------
1 DEFAULT_VLAN Static
50 VLAN50 Static
100 VLAN100 Static
So what we've completed above, is we have created to VLANs, 50 and 100, created a TRUNK, using two switch ports, and added VLANs 50 and 100 to the trunk
You then connect vmnic2 and vmnic3 to these physical ports, but you must then alter the VM Network Portgroup to include Tags 50 and 100.
You could also delete vSwitch2, and use vmnic4 on another vSwitch.
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 50 - Create VLAN 50
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-50)# VLAN 100 - Create VLAN 100
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 100
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Status and Counters - VLAN Information
Maximum VLANs to support : 8
Primary VLAN : DEFAULT_VLAN
Management VLAN :
802.1Q VLAN ID Name Status
-------------- ------------- -------------
1 DEFAULT_VLAN Static
50 VLAN50 Static
100 VLAN100 Static
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# trunk a13-a14 trk1 - Create TRUNK trk1 (static) no LACP - VMware does not support this!
Switch-4108GL#5(config)#sh
Load Balancing
Port | Name Type | Group Type
---- + --------------------------
A13 | 1000SX | Trk1 Trunk
A14 | 1000SX | Trk1 Trunk
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 50
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-50)# tagged Trk1
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-50)# exit
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# VLAN 100
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(vlan-100)#
Switch-4108GL#5(config)# show vlan ports Trk1
Status and Counters - VLAN Information - for ports Trk1
802.1Q VLAN ID Name Status
-------------- ------------- -------------
1 DEFAULT_VLAN Static
50 VLAN50 Static
100 VLAN100 Static
So what we've completed above, is we have created to VLANs, 50 and 100, created a TRUNK, using two switch ports, and added VLANs 50 and 100 to the trunk
You then connect vmnic2 and vmnic3 to these physical ports, but you must then alter the VM Network Portgroup to include Tags 50 and 100.
You could also delete vSwitch2, and use vmnic4 on another vSwitch.
Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by
Your issues matter to us.
Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.
Start your 7-day free trial
thanks for this great info. still confused though. now, you've done so much work here, not sure if you want to continue, but I do have more questions / comments. feel free to not answer or request I ask a new question so you can receive the appropriate amount of points.
so I see how to create the vlans and trunks on the switch - very straightforward with your directions.
I see ports 13 and 14 are used for the trunk and the vlans are assigned to the trunk. what exactly do I physically plug into ports 13 and 14?
VLAN ID is entered on each vSwitch under the Properties, correct? or does that have to be done using the CLI? Either way, I would enter vlan50 on vSwitch1 and vlan100 on vSwitch2, correct?
why would I not need two vSwitches? vmnic 2 and 3 are on the 50 subnet. won't I need vmnic4 for access to the 100 subnet? how could I delete vSwitch 2, where vmnic4 is located, and still have a connection to the san nics for the 100 subnet?
also, once this is set up correctly, what do I do with the existing connections? I have 4 cables from each server running to each switch (2 on the 50 subnet and 2 on the 100 subnet).
again, sorry for all of the questions. didn't realize I knew so little about this.
THANKS!
so I see how to create the vlans and trunks on the switch - very straightforward with your directions.
I see ports 13 and 14 are used for the trunk and the vlans are assigned to the trunk. what exactly do I physically plug into ports 13 and 14?
VLAN ID is entered on each vSwitch under the Properties, correct? or does that have to be done using the CLI? Either way, I would enter vlan50 on vSwitch1 and vlan100 on vSwitch2, correct?
why would I not need two vSwitches? vmnic 2 and 3 are on the 50 subnet. won't I need vmnic4 for access to the 100 subnet? how could I delete vSwitch 2, where vmnic4 is located, and still have a connection to the san nics for the 100 subnet?
also, once this is set up correctly, what do I do with the existing connections? I have 4 cables from each server running to each switch (2 on the 50 subnet and 2 on the 100 subnet).
again, sorry for all of the questions. didn't realize I knew so little about this.
THANKS!
I'll ask one question why do you want to use VLANs?
you plug in vmnic2 and vmnic3.
you edit the VLAN Tag, on the portgroup, and add the correct Tag number, e.g. 50 and 100.
your traffic VLAN 50 and VLAN 100 is not being carried along the same TRUNK, and tnaverseing both vmnics, and being distribruted by the tags.
so vSwitch2 is not required, once you have created another VLAN Portgroup on it.
you plug in vmnic2 and vmnic3.
you edit the VLAN Tag, on the portgroup, and add the correct Tag number, e.g. 50 and 100.
your traffic VLAN 50 and VLAN 100 is not being carried along the same TRUNK, and tnaverseing both vmnics, and being distribruted by the tags.
so vSwitch2 is not required, once you have created another VLAN Portgroup on it.
so what other nics go to 50 and 100 network?
so far, we've covered vmnic2 and vmnic3, (vmnic4 is spare or could be added to the trunk).
Usually VLANs are used to reduce physical networking, where we have a shortage of phnysical network cards.
you have 5 physical network cards.
so far, we've covered vmnic2 and vmnic3, (vmnic4 is spare or could be added to the trunk).
Usually VLANs are used to reduce physical networking, where we have a shortage of phnysical network cards.
you have 5 physical network cards.
I was thinking of using vlans in case I had a switch go out. I have 2 switches. One on the 50 subnet and one on the 100 subnet. if one goes out, I thought I could just pull the cables from it and plug into the other switches vlan ports that were configured with the subnet of the switch that went down.
"your traffic VLAN 50 and VLAN 100 is not being carried along the same TRUNK, and tnaverseing both vmnics, and being distribruted by the tags." did you mean the traffic IS being carried along the same trunk and distributed via tags? because if not, I give up!
only vmnic 2, 3, and 4 go to 50 and 100 (2 and 3 for 50 and 4 for 100)
if there is a simpler way to achieve my goal, short of buying another switch, please let me know.
many thanks for your putting up with my questions.
"your traffic VLAN 50 and VLAN 100 is not being carried along the same TRUNK, and tnaverseing both vmnics, and being distribruted by the tags." did you mean the traffic IS being carried along the same trunk and distributed via tags? because if not, I give up!
only vmnic 2, 3, and 4 go to 50 and 100 (2 and 3 for 50 and 4 for 100)
if there is a simpler way to achieve my goal, short of buying another switch, please let me know.
many thanks for your putting up with my questions.
sorry is being carried along the same TRUNK!!!!!!
well depending upon what you want to do, you could trunk all ports
vmnic2,3,4 VLAN 50 and VLAN 100 that gives you load balancing, teaming, across all three network ports, carrying both VLANs 50 and 100.
well depending upon what you want to do, you could trunk all ports
vmnic2,3,4 VLAN 50 and VLAN 100 that gives you load balancing, teaming, across all three network ports, carrying both VLANs 50 and 100.
but on the SAN side, you would need to ensure that the correct ports are Tagged and offered to the SAN so the ESX traffic reaches the correct ports.
But do you uinderstand, the SAN ports MUST be in the SAME VLANs, otherwise traffic will never reach the SAN.
yes, that is one thing I understand! now I just need to find out how to do so. one SAN is an EMC AX4-5i (production) and the other is an HP p2000 g3 (not yet in production).
so if 13 and 14 are my trunks and I plug vmnic2 and 3 into those, where would vmnics 4 and 5 be plugged in? I am confused here as vmnics 2 and 3 are teamed and would be configured with VLAN 50, leaving no connection for subnet / VLAN 100 which is on vmnic 4 (soon teamed with vmnic5).
also, if for some reason 13 and/or 14 go out, no other ports are configured for these VLANs. should I configure trunks on more than these two ports for failover / resilience?
you asked, "I'll ask one question why do you want to use VLANs?".
I answered "I was thinking of using vlans in case I had a switch go out. I have 2 switches. One on the 50 subnet and one on the 100 subnet. if one goes out, I thought I could just pull the cables from it and plug into the other switches vlan ports that were configured with the subnet of the switch that went down."
you also stated, VLANs are usually used when there is a shortage of physical network cards. I actually have 8 ports across 3 cards (two 2-port and one 4-port) in each server, along with two 24-port switches each dedicated to its own SAN subnet (50 and 100).
is my thinking muddled / flawed? is there something else I should do to achieve my goal of SAN network failover / resilience? maybe I should've asked "is it possible / advisable to configure two different subnets on one switch?" strictly for failover and only used if one switch goes out and only until I get a replacement (couple days max, if over a weekend).
thanks again for your guidance and patience!
so if 13 and 14 are my trunks and I plug vmnic2 and 3 into those, where would vmnics 4 and 5 be plugged in? I am confused here as vmnics 2 and 3 are teamed and would be configured with VLAN 50, leaving no connection for subnet / VLAN 100 which is on vmnic 4 (soon teamed with vmnic5).
also, if for some reason 13 and/or 14 go out, no other ports are configured for these VLANs. should I configure trunks on more than these two ports for failover / resilience?
you asked, "I'll ask one question why do you want to use VLANs?".
I answered "I was thinking of using vlans in case I had a switch go out. I have 2 switches. One on the 50 subnet and one on the 100 subnet. if one goes out, I thought I could just pull the cables from it and plug into the other switches vlan ports that were configured with the subnet of the switch that went down."
you also stated, VLANs are usually used when there is a shortage of physical network cards. I actually have 8 ports across 3 cards (two 2-port and one 4-port) in each server, along with two 24-port switches each dedicated to its own SAN subnet (50 and 100).
is my thinking muddled / flawed? is there something else I should do to achieve my goal of SAN network failover / resilience? maybe I should've asked "is it possible / advisable to configure two different subnets on one switch?" strictly for failover and only used if one switch goes out and only until I get a replacement (couple days max, if over a weekend).
thanks again for your guidance and patience!
team and trunk either
vmnic 2,3,4,5 in one four port trunk with vlan 50 and vlan 100
or vmnic 2,3 trunk vlan 50
and vmnic 4,5 trunk vlan 100
oh, I kind of understand.
but you could do the same with connect
vmnic2,3 to one switch
vmnic4,5 to one switch
connect SANs network interface 1 to one switch, 1 to another switch!
one switch fails you still have a path to storage? with no vlans, no unplug cables?
vmnic 2,3,4,5 in one four port trunk with vlan 50 and vlan 100
or vmnic 2,3 trunk vlan 50
and vmnic 4,5 trunk vlan 100
oh, I kind of understand.
but you could do the same with connect
vmnic2,3 to one switch
vmnic4,5 to one switch
connect SANs network interface 1 to one switch, 1 to another switch!
one switch fails you still have a path to storage? with no vlans, no unplug cables?
HOLY $H!+, is this all moot!
I currently have vmnic2,3 on the 50 subnet switch and vmnic4,5 on the 100 subnet switch. I also have one port from each storage processor on the 50 switch and one port from each storage processor on the 100 subnet switch. Since my server is connected to the SAN over the 50 and 100 subnets, on dedicated switches, if the 100 subnet switch goes out, for example, the VMs / server will still be connected to the SAN over the 50 subnet switch, allowing the VMs to continue running, correct? If so, and if my set up is already redundant, I really need to take a vacation, and possibly contemplate a career change, cause I am no longer thinking things out before I start to stress about it! and if so, sorry to have wasted your time, but thanks for the great lesson on VLANs!
I currently have vmnic2,3 on the 50 subnet switch and vmnic4,5 on the 100 subnet switch. I also have one port from each storage processor on the 50 switch and one port from each storage processor on the 100 subnet switch. Since my server is connected to the SAN over the 50 and 100 subnets, on dedicated switches, if the 100 subnet switch goes out, for example, the VMs / server will still be connected to the SAN over the 50 subnet switch, allowing the VMs to continue running, correct? If so, and if my set up is already redundant, I really need to take a vacation, and possibly contemplate a career change, cause I am no longer thinking things out before I start to stress about it! and if so, sorry to have wasted your time, but thanks for the great lesson on VLANs!
INDEED I WILL! afterwhich I may humbly find other means of income outside of IT, but in this economy...
THANKS AGAIN!
THANKS AGAIN!
Thanks. Although I didn't set up the VLANs, I learned a lot about them and how to configure them. I am certain someone will find the commands useful.
Thanks hanccocka!
Thanks hanccocka!
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
VMware
From novice to tech pro — start learning today.
Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by
Enjoy your complimentary solution view.
Get this solution by purchasing an Individual license!
Start your 7-day free trial.
what does you current ESX host networking look like, screenshot would be helpful.
you can configure via web gui or telnet, I find it easier to configure switches via command line interface, via telnet.