Solved

Recreate a table with partitions

Posted on 2012-03-12
7
185 Views
Last Modified: 2012-03-15
Hello!

i have a table X with dependencies to other tables,views and the works ( 325 million rows approx.)

cannot use export import as i have to delete the orig.table.
switch partition is not a option "I THINK?"

what do i do?

I MUST USE read only FILEGROUPS on this table. WHY? because of faster backup and the data will never change. ( create partitions for a quarter ( 4 months). most of the queries runs against this table (cannot create a historic DB) and other issues from the departments.
0
Comment
Question by:shanj
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:lcohan
ID: 37714802
"
i have a table X with dependencies to other tables,views and the works ( 325 million rows approx.)

cannot use export import as i have to delete the orig.table.
switch partition is not a option "I THINK?"

what do i do?

"


Sorry but in my opinion is not clear what do you really need to do therefor could you let us know what the real task is?
Do you need to transfer that table into another server/database/table then drop it??
0
 

Author Comment

by:shanj
ID: 37715338
I would like to create a partition on this table. with about 24 filgroups.
each file group will represent a quater year.( 4 months)
Further more after each quarter  i would like to make these filegroups into read only filegroups. ( i will be taking partial backups?)
0
 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:lcohan
ID: 37716268
"I would like to create a partition on this table. with about 24 filgroups."
I suggest create a new table as above and populate it from the old one than drop the old one but of course do all these in a test environment even if you don't have the 325 million rows in test env.

"each file group will represent a quater year.( 4 months)"
Then why not
1 table with 3 partitions?
    1 old and inactive,
    1 current and active,
    1 future to have it ready for > currentdate + next quarter (4months)
1 archive table with same structure to hold your historical data and where you could switch out/attach obsolete(old and inactive) partitions from above table.

BTW - 1 quarter in my opinion = 3 months (not 4) so you will have a full year sliding window in the active partitioned table with 4 (right boundary) partitions.



"Further more after each quarter  i would like to make these filegroups into read only filegroups. ( i will be taking partial backups?)"

Above scenario works as well for "partial backups" if you consider each partition on its own physical filegroup and backup the one(s) at will.
0
VMware Disaster Recovery and Data Protection

In this expert guide, you’ll learn about the components of a Modern Data Center. You will use cases for the value-added capabilities of Veeam®, including combining backup and replication for VMware disaster recovery and using replication for data center migration.

 

Author Comment

by:shanj
ID: 37720067
I suggest create a new table as above and populate it from the old one than drop the old one ...

My problem is my old table has a lot of dependencies.?
0
 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:lcohan
ID: 37720087
I think if you create a new partitioned table and keep using the existing one as a read only history/archive you don't need to worry about dependencies however the new one must be obviously added to all the code using old one.
0
 

Author Comment

by:shanj
ID: 37720981
OK, this is a solution. i See it. not sure if the developers + users will accept this, they have to change a lot of rapports ( buisness Objects) and have 2 copies of the same report?
0
 
LVL 39

Accepted Solution

by:
lcohan earned 500 total points
ID: 37721714
Another way to deal with what you just said would be to add this new partitioned table for active portion of data, rename the old one to original_table_name_history or something then create a VIEW  with identical name as old table and give exactly same permisions. I used this scenario pretty often when adding/changing object names were a pain from app develpment - maintenance point of view and it worked. Only thing is you may need to have your app down while renaming the SQL objects but other than that the scenario should work and this way the process is disconneted from the front end.
0

Featured Post

Use Case: Protecting a Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure

Microsoft Azure is rapidly becoming the norm in dynamic IT environments. This document describes the challenges that organizations face when protecting data in a hybrid cloud IT environment and presents a use case to demonstrate how Acronis Backup protects all data.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

After restoring a Microsoft SQL Server database (.bak) from backup or attaching .mdf file, you may run into "Error '15023' User or role already exists in the current database" when you use the "User Mapping" SQL Management Studio functionality to al…
There have been several questions about Large Transaction Log Files in SQL Server 2008, and how to get rid of them when disk space has become critical. This article will explain how to disable full recovery and implement simple recovery that carries…
Microsoft Active Directory, the widely used IT infrastructure, is known for its high risk of credential theft. The best way to test your Active Directory’s vulnerabilities to pass-the-ticket, pass-the-hash, privilege escalation, and malware attacks …

832 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question