Problem with oracle on hp-ux cluster

I have 2 hp-ux servers as a cluster and there is an oracle database running on these servers. They share Eva discs for the database. After a firmware update of the EVA, the servers came up and the db as normally was accessible through the a-node. But the db was behaving very strange and it had to be brought down. After that I rebooted the server (a-node) but when the db came up, was the db on the b-node, so a normal failover for so far. after that I brought the a-node down again and also the b-node. The a-node has been then brought up first but without th db.... I would think when the primary node comes up, the db will come up together with it but this was not the case. When I bring up the b-node, the db comes up with it and is available for use.
Question: how can I make the db come up with the a-node again and leave the b-node as a failover server in the cluster. Because now the a-node is not a failover server because when the b-node goes down, the db does not failover to the a-node. Need some commands to figure out what the problem can be. This is not a Oracle RAC it is a hp-ux cluster. I am not familiar with hp-ux. Some help is appreciated.
sharschoAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

gheistCommented:
Some versions of products would be handy. Also what exactly you did upgrade? How?
0
sharschoAuthor Commented:
The update has been on the software of the eva storage system and had nothing to do with the servers. All servers that has a connection with the eva had to go down so that the update could take place on storage system.
0
gheistCommented:
It updates with servers working. (Maybe some IO timeout in some picky application)....

So how did you upgrade? Really?

Did you change topology? reset parameters? did FC switch reset? Gimme some dirt?

Where are your VERSIONS???
0
Big Business Goals? Which KPIs Will Help You

The most successful MSPs rely on metrics – known as key performance indicators (KPIs) – for making informed decisions that help their businesses thrive, rather than just survive. This eBook provides an overview of the most important KPIs used by top MSPs.

sharschoAuthor Commented:
I will answer your questions first:
The upgrade was for the OS of the controller so it had nothing to do with the FC switches and or the HP-UX servers. FC switches were not resetted.

now today I went further and looking myself. I now know that HPUX serviceguard is the cluster software on that server.
The only thing that occurred was that the primary server has been brought down while the failover server was still running. So I think that the failover server took the disks over and even when I bring down the server with the shutdown -h -y now command, it locks the disks so that when I bring up the primary server it can not mount the disks so that the disks are available on the server. Both disks have been brought down with the command shutdown -h -y now. But when the problems occurred, the database has been brought down and the server has been brought down with only the shutdown command. And all this while the failover server was up abd running.

So the solution I need is for how to bring down the failover server so that it releases the disks so that the primary node can mount the disks at boot up. What are the commands to release and attach disks to a server in a cluster node? There are no errors in the logfile only that the disks are in use when the primary node comes up. I have no serviceguard knowledge so maybe someone can help out with this.
0
gheistCommented:
Thre are some requirements regarding FC controller firmwares for each new eva version. They need some system drivers, and some system patchlevels. On those some oracle hotfixes are advised to keep it supported....

Serviceguard for oracle or serviceguard as such?

VERSION NUMBERS NOW!!!!
0
sharschoAuthor Commented:
The problem is not with oracle. I did explain that so many times. I figured it out myself now. The HPUX serviceguard commands for stopping the cluster package had to be used. In my previous comment I clearly stated the issue. that you still ask me for version numbers, is unbelieveable. I halted the cluster package on the b-node and started it on the a-node with the hpux commands. Now the filesystems for the database are mounted again on the a-node and the database is running just fine as it was when I opened this ticket. The update does not have anything to do with the hpux server and or the software running on the hpux server. It only affects the os that runs on the EVA to control the disks and if there was a problem with that, I would not see the disks on the b-node either and the database would not run on the b-node either if the update affects the oracle version. The oracle version is 10G and the eva OS version is 6.2.4.0 Thanks anyways for your attempt for trying to help out.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
gheistCommented:
Do you use ServiceGuard extension for Oracle?

Do not get ridiculous - version numbers you post so far do not make sense. Please check patchlevels yourself against HP support matrices.
0
gheistCommented:
If you got oracle agents in service guard like me i would be able to help diagnose problem, otherwise i could offer some hand with running oracle as a normal service under service guard..... no knowing which is your problem i am unable to helo.
0
sharschoAuthor Commented:
Because even when I explained the problem I did not get an advice that was pointing to a solution for the problem. We had an external here in the office for another project and just telling him what happened, he could point out what it can be related to hpux. And he knows about the storage upgrade because he was involved. He said to look at 2 things and point out what had to be done to solve the problem.  That is exchange of knowledge not what I experienced in this ticket.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Oracle Database

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.