trigger fails when updating >1 row

Why would this trigger succeed if there's only one row to be updated, but it fails if there's >1 row to be updated?

IF EXISTS (select null
      from   Appeals a INNER JOIN
         INSERTED i ON a.ParcelNo = i.ParcelNo
                AND a.TaxYear = i.TaxYear
                AND a.LValue = i.CertValue
                AND a.LAssmt = i.CertAssmt)
UPDATE Appeals SET Ruling = 'AFFIRMED'
FROM   Appeals as a INNER JOIN
             INSERTED AS i on a.ParcelNo = i.ParcelNo
            AND a.TaxYear = i.TaxYear
                                   AND a.LValue = i.CertValue
                                   AND a.LAssmt = i.CertAssmt

The error message I get is:
Subquery returned more than one value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, etc. or when the subquery is used as an expression.

Sorry this is all text, but I can't figure out how to post code and text separately in the new EE. :(
LVL 4
GordonPrinceAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

GordonPrinceAuthor Commented:
This is pretty similar, and a bit more economical. It seems to have the same behavior. I don't understand why this one fails either.

TRIGGER AFTER UPDATE OF Parcel...
-------------------------------------
UPDATE Appeals SET Ruling = 'AFFIRMED'
FROM   Appeals as a INNER JOIN
         INSERTED AS i on a.ParcelNo = i.ParcelNo
                               AND a.TaxYear = i.TaxYear                                                       AND a.LValue = i.CertValue
                   AND a.LAssmt = i.CertAssmt
WHERE Ruling IS NULL
   OR Ruling <> 'AFFIRMED'
0
dwkorCommented:
Do you have any triggers on Appeals table or other triggers on Parcel table?
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jogosCommented:
The trigger handles all updated rows at same time. The join-condition between the 'inserted' (updated rows) and the appeals table is simply not unique.

This problem occurs only when that join returns multiple records, so for another multiple record update it could be the join returns only one row per record you want to update.

Try to fake that update-join with a select-join but now not from 'inserted' (that's obvious only available in trigger) but from real table with a
WHERE PK in ([list of PK's of updated records])

Other possibility To debug create a table that can contain the result of the join and replace the updat in your trigger with to insert the records to that table and do your update again, then analyse why the join returns to much.
 


PS to make a EE code-bloc click on 'code' in the menu just on top of the textbox you are tiyping in.
0
GordonPrinceAuthor Commented:
The error was being caused by another trigger on the Appeals table. From my application it was just showing me the error. When I ran update statements from SQL Management Console I could see the name of the trigger that was causing the trouble. Good thinking. Thanks.

PS: I found out there's an issue with EE and IE9, for which EE has posted a fix.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft SQL Server 2005

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.