?
Solved

Virtualizing 4 Servers

Posted on 2012-03-13
5
Medium Priority
?
376 Views
Last Modified: 2012-03-30
So two of our four servers are depreciating and I'm considering virtualizing them (one is the Domain Controller).

In fact, I'm considering virtualizing all of our servers to one powerhouse machine that I have 2  x3440 2.53 4phys/8logical CPUs (so 8 physical, 16 Logical cores), 32GB of RAM and 12 146GB 15K SAS Drives.

Server 1:  DC/Fileserver/Backup Exec/AV Manager
Server 2:  1 instance of SQL (hit by 5 users max) <- grossly under utilized
Server 3:  Exchange 2010 (50 mailboxes, mid use, all under 5GB, most under 1GB),
Server 4:  BES (getting rid of BES), Lync (for chat only), WSUS, System Center Essentials

Would this be worth virtualizing to a few different instances of of server:

vServer 1: DC
vServer 2: Fileserver/Backup Exec, AV Manager
vServer 3: Exchange
vServer 4: Lync
vServer 5: WSUS/SCE

Should I use a SAN or a NAS to divide up the load on the 12 15K SAS Drives?

Should I do this at all?

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
JOe K.
0
Comment
Question by:ClaudeWalker
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
gmbaxter earned 1000 total points
ID: 37716333
I would only consider virtualising them as follows:

SAN for shared storage
Redundant SAN switch
2 VM hosts
failover / HA of virtual machines between the 2 hosts

You should also keep one physical DC.
0
 
LVL 123

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 1000 total points
ID: 37716375
If you have the time I would divide the services and roles, if Microsoft Licensing is not going to cost you.

As for SAN, I would keep all the spindles and disks in the same RAID 10 set. More spindles, More disks = More IOPS = More Performance.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ClaudeWalker
ID: 37716400
Are you suggesting 2 SANS with 6 drives each or 1 SAN with 12 Drives (and redundancy)?

1 DC
1 Server with all the remaining VMs and then 1 Server as the failover?

So 2 sans and 3 servers?

Thansk,
JOe K.
0
 
LVL 123
ID: 37716405
Do you need a SAN, how many VMware hosts are you using?
0
 

Author Comment

by:ClaudeWalker
ID: 37716484
Not sure yet.  I have 12 drives so I would need some sort of enclosure.  I just assumed SAN or NAS.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The following article is comprised of the pearls we have garnered deploying virtualization solutions since Virtual Server 2005 and subsequent 2008 RTM+ Hyper-V in standalone and clustered environments.
Concerto Cloud Services, a provider of fully managed private, public and hybrid cloud solutions, announced today it was named to the 20 Coolest Cloud Infrastructure Vendors Of The 2017 Cloud  (http://www.concertocloud.com/about/in-the-news/2017/02/0…
Teach the user how to configure vSphere clusters to support the VMware FT feature Open vSphere Web Client: Verify vSphere HA is enabled: Verify netowrking for vMotion and FT Logging is in place or create it: Turn On FT for a virtual machine: Verify …
Teach the user how to install and configure the vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance Open vSphere Web Client: Deploy vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance OVA file: Verify vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance boots successfully: Connect to the …
Suggested Courses

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question