troubleshooting Question

What is the value of Continuous Local Replication n Exchange 2007?

Avatar of Harold Krongelb
Harold KrongelbFlag for United States of America asked on
ExchangeWindows Server 2003
2 Comments1 Solution231 ViewsLast Modified:
When our Exchange 2007 server was set up four years ago, the IT provider (who we no longer use) set up Continuous Local Replication.  The backup data store resides on the same raid array as the primary data store, so a hardware failure would likely affect both the primary and backup store.  We perform nightly backups.

I have read that the backup data store allows for quick recovery.  Since it is in the same storage array as the primary data store, it would not be useful in the event of a catastrophic disk failure.  I presume that any damage in the primary store would be replicated to the backup store, although I can find no documentation that helps me answer this either way.  The logical partition has plenty of space, so that is not an issue.

My question is:  Is there any point in continuing the local replication on the same raid array?  Or am I creating a backup that will never be usable?
Join the community to see this answer!
Join our exclusive community to see this answer & millions of others.
Unlock 1 Answer and 2 Comments.
Join the Community
Learn from the best

Network and collaborate with thousands of CTOs, CISOs, and IT Pros rooting for you and your success.

Andrew Hancock - VMware vExpert
See if this solution works for you by signing up for a 7 day free trial.
Unlock 1 Answer and 2 Comments.
Try for 7 days

”The time we save is the biggest benefit of E-E to our team. What could take multiple guys 2 hours or more each to find is accessed in around 15 minutes on Experts Exchange.

-Mike Kapnisakis, Warner Bros