Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

in case of low speed file transfer on file server, which parts of server should be suspected as bottle neck ?

Posted on 2012-03-15
1
Medium Priority
?
419 Views
Last Modified: 2012-03-25
I found that the transferring data speed is very low between serverA to serverB in my office.

I connected serverA and serverB directly,  link is up at Fast Ether , but the transferring speed is not enough. 50MByte takes 1 minutes.
I changed the network cable to see if network is no problem.
the result is same.

I suspect that ServerA's performance is not so good.
this ServerA is an appliance server, therefore I don't know what kind of CPU or memory are used.

In case of copy and paste data between folderA and folderB on the serverA,
50MB takes 2 minutes. ( it takes double time than network)

My question is ,
1)the reason of low data transferring speed is RAID1 ?( ServerA is Raid1)
If I change the Raid1 to Raid5, can I expect it is improved ?

2) Are there any possibility that RAID card is bottle neck ?
or SATA disk is bottle neck ? or
 low performance CPU ?
memory ?

which parts of server should be suspected as bottle neck ?

best regards
0
Comment
Question by:shouichi
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
StuWhitby earned 2000 total points
ID: 37727313
This depends on the data as much as anything else.  If you've got loads of small files, RAID 1 will perform better than RAID 5.  If it's all data and no headers, RAID 5 will probably give you better performance.

I'm assuming Windows.  To look for bottlenecks, get Process Explorer from http://technet.microsoft.com/sysinternals and look at process CPU, memory, I/O etc.  Performance Monitor will also give you the tools you need to look at this, and will give you better stats on saturation.  If it's Unix, then sar and top are the best ones I know.  Look at both user and kernel time if it's a CPU limitation.  I've seen situations where the processor has been at 56% CPU logged, but another 44% in kernel mode as it spent the time doing I/O.
0

Featured Post

Tech or Treat! - Giveaway

Submit an article about your scariest tech experience—and the solution—and you’ll be automatically entered to win one of 4 fantastic tech gadgets.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The 6120xp switches seem to have a bug when you create a fiber port channel when you have a UCS fabric interconnects talking to them.  If you follow the Cisco guide for the UCS, the FC Port channel will never come up and it will say that there are n…
this article is a guided solution for most of the common server issues in server hardware tasks we are facing in our routine job works. the topics in the following article covered are, 1) dell hardware raidlevel (Perc) 2) adding HDD 3) how t…
In this video, Percona Director of Solution Engineering Jon Tobin discusses the function and features of Percona Server for MongoDB. How Percona can help Percona can help you determine if Percona Server for MongoDB is the right solution for …
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…

636 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question