Solved

Remote Desktop Slow when connecting via win 7 but fine with wyse device

Posted on 2012-03-15
6
1,420 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-23
I am connecting to a Windows Server 2008 R2 Remote Desktop Session Host (Terminal) Server through a very fast WAN connection (4 mb up with 15ms latency) using RDP 7.1. (NOT virtualized)  I am using a proprietary database application used for Dental Practice Management.  I connect using new Dell Windows 7 64-Bit Professional machines in a domain between remote offices. I connect and log in quickly and proceed to open the software.  During the application startup process it takes about 45-60 seconds for the application to get a login prompt.  If I open the app locally or through a Wyse device I do not see the delay in login taking 5-10 seconds.  After the app is loaded I get very poor performance and the app seems to "lock up" with slow page scrolling, moving between screens and viewing\scheduling using the calendar.  I have tried with or without remoteFX.  Changing the connection settings, ie.  16-bit video, no local resources and setting the experiance to 56k.  With remoteFX  I get much better performance taking advantage of the WAN 10mb experience and remoteFX.  If i use RDP through the LAN I do not experience the issue.  The connectivity over WAN is very good.  Fair refresh time, no problems loading graphics or even scrolling through .jpg  icons.   I have used Ericom Blaze and found it to help significantly but the underlying problem is still there.  If I connect using a Wyse device over WAN I DO NOT experiance the slow application loading or the general slow RDP symptoms.  I am hoping someone may have a recommendation that takes into account the fact that the internet line and latency do not seem to be the problem.  Also I do not believ this is a remotefx issue.  I think it is unique to RDP from Windows 7 SP1 to Server 2008 R2 SP1.  Finally I have duplicated the problem at both locations.  What I mean is that I have the same problem connecting from server A to location B and server B to location A.  Different but identical Dell T710 servers with Dual Zeon X5670 processor’s, 4-15k Drives with 2 Raid 1 virtual drives and 24 GB Ram.  Same OS, updates, Anti-Virus and domain setup as well as software and user setup and security.The Remote Desktop Servers connect to a 2nd separate domain controller and have no other services (DNS,DHCP, AD) loaded other then Remote Desktop Session Host.
0
Comment
Question by:simplypc08
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 23

Accepted Solution

by:
Dirk Kotte earned 500 total points
ID: 37735288
I have seen this with to big MTU-size.
The default size are to big with WAN or VPN sometimes.
After shrinking the MTU-size the RDP-connections are fast over WAN also.

i use "SetMTU.exe" from Cisco-vpn-client to make the changes.
0
 

Author Comment

by:simplypc08
ID: 37736098
I have read about before.  I think I remember it saying to change it from 1500 to 1492 or do you have another recommendation.
0
 
LVL 23

Expert Comment

by:Dirk Kotte
ID: 37737945
with MTU of 1300 or less you have a little bit more overhead - but 1492 are to big for some connections also.
With MTU 800 it also works ...
0
Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

 

Author Comment

by:simplypc08
ID: 37745663
I am changed the setting to 1440 and saw some good results but still am hoping for more.  I have changed the mtu settings on the routers after running an mtu test.  Do I have to change the mtu settings on all of the network adaptors in the remote desktop servers that provide rdp access?  What are the drawbacks to having the mtu size set lower.
0
 
LVL 23

Expert Comment

by:Dirk Kotte
ID: 37748583
the session MTU are searched with MTU-discovery.
if your session works, the setting at one point are enough.
If MTU-Discovery give no results, you have to do the settings at the interfaces the packet leaving the server ... and sometimes at the client also.
 

with decrasing the MTU you only decrase the payload, the overhead keeps the same.
so with verry tittle packets you have more overhead than with bigger packets.
... but with WAN and VoIP litte packets are recomended - because QOS works better.

with MTU 1400 ~5% of the packet are overhead , with MTU of 800 ~10%
but thats not realy a problem.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:simplypc08
ID: 37761534
I changed the mtu at the routers between the two offices in question.  I did not need to change the  nics.   Thanks
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Scenario:  You do full backups to a internal hard drive in either product (SBS or Server 2008).  All goes well for a very long time.  One day, backups begin to fail with a message that the disk is full.  Your disk contains many, many more backups th…
Possible fixes for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 updating problem. Solutions mentioned are from Microsoft themselves. I started a case with them from our Microsoft Silver Partner option to open a case and get direct support from Microsoft. If s…
This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application and how to execute it on the appropriate database. Log onto the server running the Backup Exec database. In a larger environment, this would generally be …
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…

772 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question