Problems with LBA record in a restored OS partition

I've restored a crashed OS partition, with Acronis, from a backup image of the OS.

Now my boot manager/partition software Bare Metal says the restored drive "may not boot" becuase it ends on 615144911. The LBA begin is 63, end 615144914.

It did boot. But how do I get the LBA problem fixed?

This may be a different issue, but I'm also getting lack of permission errors from various applications (Dropbox, Snagit, Ultra Monitor, OneNote and Word).

I tried to share the appdata folder but many folders failed to allow me to do so.
jodyfaisonAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

DavidPresidentCommented:
Nothing you can do.  It is unlikely anything is there anyway.  You have a system that boots

Relax.  Any time you can recover from a crashed O/S and get, literally, 99.99999951% of the blocks back, it's been a good day.
0
jodyfaisonAuthor Commented:
dlethe,
I like your thinking, as I am a bit over it... Ha
0
DavidPresidentCommented:
I was going to come back with, "Getting 99.99999951% of the job done to perfection isn't good enough for you? Who do you think you are, my wife?"   ;)
0
IT Pros Agree: AI and Machine Learning Key

We’d all like to think our company’s data is well protected, but when you ask IT professionals they admit the data probably is not as safe as it could be.

jodyfaisonAuthor Commented:
Hear you on that on that one too!
0
jodyfaisonAuthor Commented:
Yea, theres a problem or two or 4, but it's ok.

I think I'll back it up and maybe try to install the new 8 preview on top of it?
0
DavidPresidentCommented:
Could be an issue of poorly written backup software.   If you copy 4, 8, 64 blocks at a time, it will run a heck of a lot faster then 1 block at a time.  Maybe the bozo who wrote the software skipped over the last chunk because it wasn't a multiple of the desired block size.

I'd look for a bug report.   If you wanted to know for sure, then get a freebie binary editor and put down some pattern of bytes on last few blocks, backup, change the data, then restore and compare.

If you can look at the backup image then see if your modified data is on the backup media.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jodyfaisonAuthor Commented:
Hmm interesting.
Bbackup and restore was done with Acronis True Image 12.

I wonder if they are what they use to be, as I've heard in the past they were the best.
I've found them cryptic and hard to follow, but I never changed, just tuffed it out till I sort of understand their system.

But this is not a good sign. I need something I can trust.
0
jodyfaisonAuthor Commented:
Thank you, most helpful.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Disaster Recovery

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.