See attached workbook example where this is proven by comparing the NPV calc (above) with a more "manual" set of periodic DCFs that are added up to equal the same result.
Also, you could use XNPV for this, though it would not exactly match the NPV enhanced calculation, primarily because leap year is taken into account, # days in months are different, etc., so if you have a different starting year, you'd get a slightly different result, than just working with plain vanilla periods, as with the NPV calculation.
However, I also share the XNPV approach in the attached, as well, for completeness.
IMHO for straight-forward enterprise valuation methodologies, I suggest keeping things simple and using the enhanced NPV approach, bringing the cash flows forward 1/2 year with the NPV * (1+r)^.5 as opposed to dealing with XNPV. The differences in the calculation should not be material.
Again, this is primarily talking about even cash flows, where we're just doing mid-period discounting, not irregular cash flows which would require a DCF calculated approach if not for XNPV.
=NPV(periodic_rate,cash_fl
Mid-Period Discounting can utilize the existing NPV formula, with one modification:
=NPV(periodic_rate,cash_fl
See attached workbook example where this is proven by comparing the NPV calc (above) with a more "manual" set of periodic DCFs that are added up to equal the same result.
Here's a confirming link:
See Pg 48, re: http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/office-and-productivity-applications/9780735623965/evaluating-investments-by-using-net-present-value-criteria/48#X2ludGVybmFsX0ZsYXNoUmVhZGVyP3htbGlkPTk3ODA3MzU2MjM5NjUvNDg=
A bit on XNPV as an alternative:
Also, you could use XNPV for this, though it would not exactly match the NPV enhanced calculation, primarily because leap year is taken into account, # days in months are different, etc., so if you have a different starting year, you'd get a slightly different result, than just working with plain vanilla periods, as with the NPV calculation.
However, I also share the XNPV approach in the attached, as well, for completeness.
IMHO for straight-forward enterprise valuation methodologies, I suggest keeping things simple and using the enhanced NPV approach, bringing the cash flows forward 1/2 year with the NPV * (1+r)^.5 as opposed to dealing with XNPV. The differences in the calculation should not be material.
Again, this is primarily talking about even cash flows, where we're just doing mid-period discounting, not irregular cash flows which would require a DCF calculated approach if not for XNPV.
Further discussion on using NPV versus XNPV: http://www.finance30.com/forum/topics/1987892:Topic:38950
Cheers,
Dave