asked on Xenapp 6.5 Published Desktop Application Extensions
Hi!
I am deploying a new Xenapp farm. We are publishing a desktop and I have and issue with how the file shares are being mapped. I am publishing office into the published desktop on dedicated "Office Servers" That part works fine except I am running into an issue when you open a file locally inside published Desktop it recognizes the extension and open the office program. For this example lets say it is MS word that is being published into the desktop. Word opens and I get the following error.
"\\CLIENT\U$\filename.docx
If I go to file -> open and browse to the location it opens fine. Just isnt being passed throught the desktop session to the app session.
I am fairly new to Xenapp and I have a lot of PS 4 time but we didnt publish applications the same way I am trying to do it now.
So thanks in advance and I really appreciate it!
Casey
I am deploying a new Xenapp farm. We are publishing a desktop and I have and issue with how the file shares are being mapped. I am publishing office into the published desktop on dedicated "Office Servers" That part works fine except I am running into an issue when you open a file locally inside published Desktop it recognizes the extension and open the office program. For this example lets say it is MS word that is being published into the desktop. Word opens and I get the following error.
"\\CLIENT\U$\filename.docx
If I go to file -> open and browse to the location it opens fine. Just isnt being passed throught the desktop session to the app session.
I am fairly new to Xenapp and I have a lot of PS 4 time but we didnt publish applications the same way I am trying to do it now.
So thanks in advance and I really appreciate it!
Casey
CitrixWindows Server 2008Microsoft Office
Last Comment
Ayman Bakr
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
ASKER
You are a gentleman and a scholar.. Thanks so much. I had done that reg edit but it was in the 32-bit env.
Casey
Casey
ASKER
I've requested that this question be closed as follows:
Accepted answer: 0 points for casedog21's comment #37747722
for the following reason:
It was spot on.
Accepted answer: 0 points for casedog21's comment #37747722
for the following reason:
It was spot on.
I am wondering if it was spot on, then wouldn't I deserve the points??
It was my pleasure that my comment was a spot on to resolving your issue. I appreciate your complement by describing me as a scholar.
However, in order for me (and other experts) to continue supporting you it would be at least fair to grant me the points especially that you accepted my comment as a spot on to your issue.
However, in order for me (and other experts) to continue supporting you it would be at least fair to grant me the points especially that you accepted my comment as a spot on to your issue.
I did the reg hack for the Native drives setting and that did not take care of it.
Thanks!