canon imageRunner installed individually to workstations or server, then shared

Hello,
I am setting up some users on a canon 6055 multifunction. I'm curious as to whether I should install it to the Windows 2003 server and share out or just install to each workstation and let the canon do the print server functions. It's a very advanced device and i'm sure it has everything it needs to be able to handle the 10 or less users that will be accessing it.
My instinct is to just install to each workstation individually from the installation software. Is there any benefits one way or another?

Thanks
bwierzbickiAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

dumpsterdivingdaveCommented:
If some of the printing/scanning functionality is being handled via application, I would install it to the workstations.  If all functionality is handled from the printer driver, the server would be a batter bet.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
hdhondtCommented:
Installing it on the server means that you have more control over the users: you can decide who has access, you can set their printing defaults, etc. Installing on each workstation gives more control to the individual. It also makes it slightly more difficult for the user to install. With a server, the user just selects the printer on the server, and completes the installation. With individual installation, the user has to install a TCP/IP port, find the driver files, etc. This can all be done with a script, but that then means more work for the administrator.

For a small number of users I normally prefer individual installations, especially if they're reasonably knowledgable. For large groups, server installation is the way to go. 10 users is borderline.

As for the printer supporting it, there should be no problem either way. The spooling will be done by the PCs (or the server), not by the printer; the printer just accepts the jobs on a first-come-first-served basis.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Printers and Scanners

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.