XAJAX or Javascript Callback

Hello,

Actually i'm using xAjax and PHP... xajax is an extension between PHP and AJAX with the same features than AJAX but more accessible...

In the new version of XAJAX, a method to call a xajax function isnt working...

This project is like dead... great project, but nobody answer in forums, the last release is 2010...

http://www.xajax-project.org/

Anyway, somebody here is using xAjax?

itsnt working with the last xajax version... calling in javascript a function synchronous

xajax.call(FUNCTION_NAME,
      {
          mode:'synchronous',
          parameters:[SOME_PARAM]
          }
    );

Any idea?

xajax. -> it exists, since the code has many calls like xajax.config.method, xajax.request.URI, all in javascript, what seems like this object "xajax." really exists in the code...

Regards,
LVL 4
cebassoAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Ray PaseurCommented:
No points for this, but the canonical AJAX library is jQuery.  Your best solution may be to convert from XAJAX to jQuery.
http://docs.jquery.com/Tutorials

Best regards, ~Ray
0
cebassoAuthor Commented:
Hey Ray, thanks for help!

Really, its a good idea... i already worked with XAJAX/JSON/JSONP but using xAjax is more accessible, more easy hehe

But thanks anyway for help!

I'll wait, maybe somebody face this problem too and solved...

Thanks!
0
designatedinitializerCommented:
:)
give it up and do like Ray says...
don't be afrai of jQuery; it's pretty easy too.
0
cebassoAuthor Commented:
Hello,

I found the way... contacting the project developers...

just changing from xajax.call to xajax.request...

xajax.request({xjxfun:'FUNCTION_NAME'},
    {
    mode: 'synchronous',
    parameters:[SOME_PARAM]
    }
  );

Now i think that i should delete this question... but maybe another one has the same problem and here is the answer...
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
cebassoAuthor Commented:
I don't wanna points for this... but i can't accept another solutions since everybody is telling to use pure ajax/jquery but my question was about xajax... and was possible to do exactly how that i want...
Thanks anyway for help!
Regards,
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Web Development

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.