SUMIF with LOOKUP

I have a static table and a filtered table in the attached document and I need do a SUMIF whereby (for example) all 'Aus Super' invoices currently visible on the right table (the filtered table) and SUM'ed up in the static table on the left...

This will make more sense when you can view the Excel document I am sure...

Thanks
Super-Liability.xlsx
recycleausAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

dlmilleCommented:
You can put this formula in column E (or your column of choice - I put it in E in the attachment, though you may be wanting it in column C?) and copy down:

[E2]=SUMIF(Table1[Super],$A2,Table1[Amount])

Note [A9] = "Integra Super" - Should it not be "Integra" to match the table?

See attached.

Dave
Super-Liability.xlsx
0
recycleausAuthor Commented:
Thanks Dave but when I apply a filter on the right table (date range generally) it doesn't update the totals in the summary table on the left
0
dlmilleCommented:
Got it.  Will revert in a few ( I'm a meeting)
0
Get expert help—faster!

Need expert help—fast? Use the Help Bell for personalized assistance getting answers to your important questions.

barry houdiniCommented:
It's a little trickier to do if you only want to include visible rows (after filter). This formula will give you the same result as Dave's when nothing is filtered

=SUMPRODUCT((Table1[Super]=$A2)+0,SUBTOTAL(9,OFFSET(Table1[Amount],ROW(Table1[Amount])-MIN(ROW(Table1[Amount])),0,1)))

....but when you filter it only sums the visible rows

regards, barry
0
recycleausAuthor Commented:
Barry it is simply giving me an answer of TRUE... no figures
0
barry houdiniCommented:
Here's the example....

I filtered by the top few items - of course the way you have the data set up you can't filter so that the top rows are hidden without losing site of the summary table - I assume the real setup is different?

barry
subtotal2.xlsx
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
barry houdiniCommented:
....or in this version I added a helper column in N using this formula

=SUBTOTAL(2,M2)

then you can simplify the column E formula to this

=SUMIFS(Table1[Amount],Table1[Super],$A2,Table1[Helper],1)

see attached

regards, barry
subtotal.xlsx
0
recycleausAuthor Commented:
thanks Barry... your first one is working great
0
dlmilleCommented:
Sorry I didn't glean the filter-ability needed on the SUM.  Thanks barry for jumping right in as I was out in meetings until now.

Cheers,

Dave
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Excel

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.