Solved

Multipath for iSCSI storage using one or two vlans and switches

Posted on 2012-03-29
8
856 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-07
I'm setting up a HP MSA P2000 SAN that has two controllers in it.  I understand why you'd want each controller to plug into a different physcial switch for redundancy, but do you really need to have two vlans/subnets, one for each controller to connect to?  Or can you just have one and do it all through a single vlan/subnet?
0
Comment
Question by:jpletcher1
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
8 Comments
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:Fizicist
ID: 37791076
As you wrote, the idea of two controllers is so you can connect each one to a different switch.  I'm not sure exactly by what you mean by "Or can you just have one".  Do you mean one vlan or one switch.  If you only want to have a single switch, that's fine.  If one controller fails, the other will continue.  Each controller is usually in it's own broadcast domain, so yes I'd split the switch into two vlans, one for each controller.  Just keep in mind that if the switch fails, everything will come to a crashing halt.  You can start with this setup and in the future just add the 2nd switch with no need to bring the setup down.  In the setups I manage, I have single SAN's to single switches and multiple SAN's to multiple switches.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jpletcher1
ID: 37801963
In my case, I have two physical switches, and each controller connects to a different one for redundancy.  But we have one vlan for all storage traffic.  My question is, is there really a need to have two vlans?  Or is there a reason you wouldn't want both controllers and sans all working off a single vlan network?
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:Fizicist
ID: 37807552
In your case you don't need two vlans.  Treat each controller as it's own network.  On the ESX hosts, you should setup iSCSI for both controllers.  Just put the controllers on separate subnets from each other.  After your done, your iSCSI setup should have both targets.
Check out...
http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere4/r40/vsp_40_iscsi_san_cfg.pdf
and see if it helps.
0
Office 365 Training for Admins

Learn how to provision tenants, synchronize on-premise Active Directory, and implement Single Sign-On with these master level course.  Only from Platform Scholar

 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:giltjr
ID: 37807814
-->In your case you don't need two vlans.
-->Just put the controllers on separate subnets from each other

From a networking standpoint typically each IP subnet is in its own VLAN.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jpletcher1
ID: 37811402
Yes, I was just about to ask what giltjr mentioned.  You say I can have one vlan, but then to put my controllers on different IP subnets.  Typically a vlan is correlated to a subnet.

What is the issue with having both controllers on the same subnet and same vlan as long as they are plugged into different physical switches?
0
 

Author Comment

by:jpletcher1
ID: 37936930
I'm just going to assume there are no issues with having both controllers use the same vlan and same IP subnet.  The info above is kind of contradicting in saying I don't need two vlans but I need to have separate subnets.  

Can anyone clear that up before I close this?
0
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
Fizicist earned 500 total points
ID: 37938566
You really don't need separate subnets.  At one customer I have an Equallogic SAN which has 2 controllers in a Active/Passive layout.  So I only have to configure the IP's for one controller and they get mirrored to the 2nd when it goes active (This setup, two controllers, one subnet).  I also have one customer with an EMC san, which has 2 controllers in an Active/Active layout.  ESX multipathing keeps track of the different paths for the systems.

Look at
http://bizsupport2.austin.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c02523110/c02523110.pdf
Page 4, two switches two servers as an example.  Not all possible setups are outlined in the PDF, but it should give you an idea.

Separate subnets may help in diagnosing a failure.  I don't have an HP San to review to check if they run on an Active/Passive setup.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jpletcher1
ID: 37938588
I guess in my mind it wouldn't matter which vendor you have or if it is active/active or active/passive would it?  It seems like it would be a general principal applied to storage networking.  

I guess having separate subnets might be good in the case of if you have two subnets that each run on completely different hardware.  

In any event, thanks for the info.  I'll go ahead and close this out.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Read this checklist to learn more about the 15 things you should never include in an email signature.
The question appears often enough, how do I transfer my data from my old server to the new server while preserving file shares, share permissions, and NTFS permisions.  Here are my tips for handling such a transfer.
In this Micro Video tutorial you will learn the basics about Database Availability Groups and How to configure one using a live Exchange Server Environment. The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability grou…
This video discusses moving either the default database or any database to a new volume.

739 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question