Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 709
  • Last Modified:

jQuery plugin vs jQuery core libary

Greetings,

Consider the following instructions:

No other external JS libraries may be used besides the jQuery core.

Would any one interpret that to mean that jQuery plugins cannot be used?  My thought was since a plugin is not a JS library, the use of plugins would be permissible.  

Am I missing something?
0
max7
Asked:
max7
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
2 Solutions
 
designatedinitializerCommented:
No. "jQuery core" excludes anything else, even plugins. Plugins are NOT jQuery core.
0
 
animecycCommented:
The above comment is correct. A plugin only extends the core functionality of jQuery, it is commonly a separate file included after jQuery.
0
 
max7Author Commented:
ok ... but I guess the wording is confusing to me specifically:

No other external JS libraries  ...


Am I correct in that a jQuery plugin is NOT a library?
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
animecycCommented:
From what I can tell you are correct in your understanding, a jQuery plugin only extends the jQuery Core library.

TL;DR

A jQuery plugin is not a library.
0
 
designatedinitializerCommented:
no, I think you are not.
'Library' or 'plugin' in this case is just different wording for "a bunch of prepackaged JS functions that provide you functionality you sould be coding yourself in the first place".
A plugin is always a library. It's just a library which abides to a specific API, in this case the jQuery plugin API.
0
 
animecycCommented:
While the above comment is correct from a technical standpoint, looking at the big picture: A jQuery plugin in this case adds to or extends a pre-existing library. The library in question being jQuery.

From a broader standpoint designatedinitializer is in fact correct as one would assume a library is just a collection functions that make doing something easier.
0
 
designatedinitializerCommented:
from the standpoint of the question asked, I am also right.
Notice the contradiction:

@animecyc
"...a jQuery plugin only extends the jQuery Core library"

@max7
"No other external JS libraries may be used besides the jQuery core."

This is a problem of logic/semantics/philosophy...
If you want the truth, there it is. If you want to hear what your heart desires...

If all else fails, you can always say "The dog ate my JavaScript"
;)
0
 
animecycCommented:
As I stated: "... the above comment is correct from a technical standpoint". Without context we can only be relative in our understanding.

Although we can truly be sure one thing: The dog did eat my JavaScript.
0
 
max7Author Commented:
'Library' or 'plugin' in this case is just different wording for "a bunch of prepackaged JS functions that provide you functionality you sould be coding yourself in the first place".

So I guess you never use plugins?  My hat is off to you ;)

But I think there is a tremendous difference between a single plugin and an entire JS library.  Comparing the two as if there is essentially no difference would be like comparing a single book to entire library of books.  Both contain words, ideas, thoughts, etc but you would never refer to a single book as a "library" for obvious reasons.


from the standpoint of the question asked, I am also right.
Notice the contradiction:
...........

Right, I thought this as well  ... setting aside the issue of "is a plugin a JS Library?" the fact that the original statement in question says that only the jQuery core can be used precludes the use of plugins.

If all else fails, you can always say "The dog ate my JavaScript"
;)

Yes, sometimes I wish I could say this! :)
0
 
max7Author Commented:
Thanks for hashing this out with me guys, very interesting discussion!
0
 
designatedinitializerCommented:
I beg to differ on this:
Comparing the two as if there is essentially no difference would be like comparing a single book to entire library of books.

There is a fundamental difference between a library and a book, as there is a difference between a function and a method in a class. A book is a container for a story, etc., while a library is a container for books. You can have a library with just one book, and it still is a library.
The problem here is a matter of categorization. That's why I mentioned philosophy.
But this is also a frame of mind absolutely indispensable for a programmer.
It's when we overlook these subtleties that we mess up.

PS: I don't code everything I need, I was saying that because this looks like it's your homework assignment we're talking about, so... if the prof tells you to not use other libraries then you should code it yourself.
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now