Centos DDOS TTL

we realize that a DDos Attack always comes with same TTL so is there any script that automatically add TTLs to ip tables
3XLcomAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Kerem ERSOYPresidentCommented:
There's no way you can work the packets over TTLs. In fact as far as I understand I think that all the source addresses are fake and generated by the DDOS engine and not real addresses. They are trying to flood your bandwidth. Since TCP/IP handshake is a 3 stage process I don't think they would do handshake and establish communication properly. It means that you have your SYN packets arrive with fake address then your server responds but since there's no actual connection this connection attempts stay there and discarded by your IRC server after some time.

Generally this type of attacks are aiming to fill your bandwidth and there's so little you can do to stop that at the local level. The best thing to do should be to contact your ISP and request DDos prevention service.

Cheers,
K.
0
3XLcomAuthor Commented:
I am the isp and our juniper firewalls does not enough package capability to our country's bandwith standarts. We have 2*1gbps metro network but in some of countries for ex. usa or germany it is very easy to rent a server with 10 Gbps ports within 200$
we are paying more then 30k$ for 2Gbps line.
So we need to block ddos without hard limits using the lines. And juniper as i said is not enough for an atack that you described correctly and what we have issued
0
Kerem ERSOYPresidentCommented:
Ok then Check the other post I've suggested you some hardware :) Arbor Pravail.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

3XLcomAuthor Commented:
Arbor is very expensive solution
we have already a botnet , spam and virus protection perfectly with juniper
we just decide sth. like between juniper and cisco a centos os . or freebsd
which bridge the network transparently
if an ip get attack with same ttl
for ex.
in 1 min. 37.xx.xx.xx ip gets attack with 117 ttl more then 1k packages. so it will block the 117 ttl for an hour to this ip

this is a perfect solution for us
free and specific solution what we need :)
0
SandyCommented:
But here you need to ensure the sizing part of that intermittent device and the rules processing speed. Because it is necessary  to check the CPS or PPS handling capacity of device before putting it in transparent/routed mode.
0
3XLcomAuthor Commented:
Think about everything is ok so then
how should we do this ?
0
3XLcomAuthor Commented:
Sorry for late acception
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Linux

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.