• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 407
  • Last Modified:

Need to unload an external assembly that is causing memory leak

Hello,
I am maintaining a fax server Windows service written in C#. The service references a compiled external .NET library for imaging functions.
In several production environments, every few days, the imaging component starts to throw exceptions claiming that memory is corrupt, and after that it stops working altogether, crashing the service.
The component's developers are no help because this is an older version of the component which isn't supported, and currently I cannot upgrade. Also, this was tested in several production environments and occurs in all of them, so it is unlikely that this is really corrupted memory. From the steady increase in memory consumption I assume this is a memory leak on their part. Restarting the service always solves the problem.
I would like to unload the reference to the external component and re-load it after each call. I prefer this to restarting the service automatically on a schedule. However, I have tried to dynamically load the component using Assembly.LoadFrom and using reflection, but the component throws generalized meaningless exceptions whenever I invoke any methods.
Can anyone suggest how to do this?
Thanks!
0
rumblefish978
Asked:
rumblefish978
1 Solution
 
ambienceCommented:
One solution is to load the assembly in a separate AppDomain rather than the main domain, unloading the AppDomian would reclaim resources - however that too does not work very well with unmanaged leaks for example. The referenced components may be using OS resources or native heap and such leaks can not be prevented even using AppDomain.

The best solution is to put the component in a separate (surrogate) exe process that remotes or use WCF if you wish. Remoting is pretty easy to setup and you may even do the hosting part without coding (just config). That exe can be recycled for each call and unloading a process will reclaim even leaked resources (at least most of them).
0
 
rumblefish978Author Commented:
Thanks for the short but thorough explanation. I will implement it the way you said.
0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Add Premium security features to your question to ensure its privacy or anonymity. Learn more about your ability to control Question Security today.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now