Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of CHI-LTD
CHI-LTDFlag for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

asked on

VM Project

So, it looks like we are going to:

Buy:
1. 2x new hosts,
2. NAS (iomega),
3. upgrade our existing host (disks and RAM)
4. win 2008
5. exchange 2010

we already have:
1. veeam
2. essenatials

Plan:
1. create AD DC VM
2. migrate all physical to the 2x new hosts (load balance the resources)
3. migrate vm's from current host to other 2x hosts - down and decommission the existing host upgrade hardware and move to DR site - do the same here and convert p-v.
4. Use NAS as repository for veeam backups.
5. migrate AD and exchange.

questions:
1. is there any VM's i.e. veeam, vsphere, DC etc that will be best left on a physical box?
2. once all are migrated from P-V we plan to migrate from 2003 to 2008 and Exchange 2007-2010 - is there anything glaring that i have missed?
3. we also plan to use veeam for exchange and SQL backup to NAS & also (option) to continue with Backup Exec 2010 for exchange backups to disk (NAS) - daily, weekly and monthly.  Is this worthwhile?
4. Do i need 3 veeam licences per host?  
5. Can veeam replication be used locally between the 2x live hosts or is it best to simply use the backups on the NAS should a host fail or be offlien for maintenance?
6. We also have 2x DC's with Exchange and SQL.  Is it reccomended to split these roles?
7. PLan to use veeam for replication of live hosts to DR.  Again what needs to be done here?

Thanks
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of CHI-LTD

ASKER

4. Is acronis vmprotect or symantec v-ray worth looking at?
Yes, they are Good New Products, but not quite as Good as Veeam.

BUT, AppAssure and Unitrends are better! Won many awards, and it will not be long before they overtake Veeam.

Acronis, have won awards recently, and are catching up.......
Avatar of CHI-LTD

ASKER

all licenced per proc ?
Avatar of CHI-LTD

ASKER

Do you see any issues with the plan?
Avatar of CHI-LTD

ASKER

I assume veeam should be physical box really?
Avatar of CHI-LTD

ASKER

But in terms of performance overhead if virtual on the host and network traffic would it help being on physical?  - especially when running backups during the day.
If i have 3x hosts with 2x CPU's then how many servers can i install veeam on?   If unlimited then virtual may be best...
You would usually on have one Veeam Server, because of the database of backups for restore.

If a virtual machine performance should not suffer. Most only use a phsyical if they want to stream to tape, connected to physical server.