CujoX
asked on
Exchange 2010 LUN Configuration
Good Morning All,
Question for you, attached is a design I’m thinking about implementing on our EMC san for Exchange 2010. The question I have is can I put all the transaction logs on one LUN separated by folders. I’m going to have 6 DB on each of our 3 Cisco UCS and really did not want to separate the Log on their own LUN.
The drive configuration on the SAN is 96 x 1TB 7200RPM Drive setup in a RAID 10 configuration giving me about 40TB usable drive space at around 4600 IOPS.
Thoughts Comments welcome.
Exchange-2010-LUN-Design-1.jpg
Question for you, attached is a design I’m thinking about implementing on our EMC san for Exchange 2010. The question I have is can I put all the transaction logs on one LUN separated by folders. I’m going to have 6 DB on each of our 3 Cisco UCS and really did not want to separate the Log on their own LUN.
The drive configuration on the SAN is 96 x 1TB 7200RPM Drive setup in a RAID 10 configuration giving me about 40TB usable drive space at around 4600 IOPS.
Thoughts Comments welcome.
Exchange-2010-LUN-Design-1.jpg
Link http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832794.aspx
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Yes we will be running a DAG so would you say that we should do the same old thing that we have been doing sense 2003/2007 T-Logs on one LUN and DB on another LUN. I figured I try and stay away from using so many drive letters but sounds like I can’t get away from it.
We were going to have a 3 copy DAG (Active | Passive | Passive )
We were going to have a 3 copy DAG (Active | Passive | Passive )