HP DL360 G7's (local storage)


Budgeting for the above, we are looking at:

additional caddy x8 600gb HDD's (16 HDD in total)
caddy - (16x 300gb).  

According to on-line calculator the RAID 6 will be 3600 & 4200 respectively.

Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

andyalderSaggar maker's framemakerCommented:
Do you mean L380 G7, DL360 G7 is only 1U an takes 4 SFF disks standard, 8 with 2nd backplane.

For RAID 6 just take off 2 from total disks and multiply by size, (16-2)*300 = 4200 etc.
CHI-LTDAuthor Commented:
yes, 380 - sorry.
andyalderSaggar maker's framemakerCommented:
Then your calculations are correct for RAID 6 assuming you use the SAS expander so that both backplanes are on the same controller, I prefer to have two separate controllers so there's twice as much cache and the cabling's easier but that does limit you to two arrays of 8 disks. If you do use the expander then get the short SAS cables, it can be done without but there's a lot of cable to get in the way with the long ones going from controller to expander.

Bear in mind the 6 I/Os per write penalty for RAID 6 if it can't write a full width stripe so the more cache the better that will be.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Acronis True Image 2019 just released!

Create a reliable backup. Make sure you always have dependable copies of your data so you can restore your entire system or individual files.

CHI-LTDAuthor Commented:
Sorry i meant 8x 600gb  raid6  =3.6tb
16x 300gb raid6 = 4.2tb

16x 600 raid6 = 8.4tb.

yes, we'd go for sas expander.
Which raid woudl you go for this then?  I'd like ability of 2x disk failures but performance also.  Raid5 with spare?
andyalderSaggar maker's framemakerCommented:
RAID 10 if you can afford it, it won't tolerate both disks in a mirror failing but short of that you can lose several disks without suffering failure or performance dedgradation. Really depends on how write intensive your application is and how random the data is. I'd avoid RAID 5, although only 4 I/Os per write performance with a disk down is often unusable.
CHI-LTDAuthor Commented:
thanks, but will lose valuable space with 1+0
andyalderSaggar maker's framemakerCommented:
I'd stick to RAID 6 then.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Server Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.