Solved

HP DL360 G7's (local storage)

Posted on 2012-04-03
7
660 Views
Last Modified: 2012-04-03
Hi

Budgeting for the above, we are looking at:

additional caddy x8 600gb HDD's (16 HDD in total)
or
caddy - (16x 300gb).  

According to on-line calculator the RAID 6 will be 3600 & 4200 respectively.

Correct?
0
Comment
Question by:CHI-LTD
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 55

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
Do you mean L380 G7, DL360 G7 is only 1U an takes 4 SFF disks standard, 8 with 2nd backplane.

For RAID 6 just take off 2 from total disks and multiply by size, (16-2)*300 = 4200 etc.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:CHI-LTD
Comment Utility
yes, 380 - sorry.
0
 
LVL 55

Accepted Solution

by:
andyalder earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
Then your calculations are correct for RAID 6 assuming you use the SAS expander so that both backplanes are on the same controller, I prefer to have two separate controllers so there's twice as much cache and the cabling's easier but that does limit you to two arrays of 8 disks. If you do use the expander then get the short SAS cables, it can be done without but there's a lot of cable to get in the way with the long ones going from controller to expander.

Bear in mind the 6 I/Os per write penalty for RAID 6 if it can't write a full width stripe so the more cache the better that will be.
0
How to run any project with ease

Manage projects of all sizes how you want. Great for personal to-do lists, project milestones, team priorities and launch plans.
- Combine task lists, docs, spreadsheets, and chat in one
- View and edit from mobile/offline
- Cut down on emails

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:CHI-LTD
Comment Utility
Sorry i meant 8x 600gb  raid6  =3.6tb
and
16x 300gb raid6 = 4.2tb

16x 600 raid6 = 8.4tb.

yes, we'd go for sas expander.
Which raid woudl you go for this then?  I'd like ability of 2x disk failures but performance also.  Raid5 with spare?
0
 
LVL 55

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
RAID 10 if you can afford it, it won't tolerate both disks in a mirror failing but short of that you can lose several disks without suffering failure or performance dedgradation. Really depends on how write intensive your application is and how random the data is. I'd avoid RAID 5, although only 4 I/Os per write performance with a disk down is often unusable.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:CHI-LTD
Comment Utility
thanks, but will lose valuable space with 1+0
0
 
LVL 55

Expert Comment

by:andyalder
Comment Utility
I'd stick to RAID 6 then.
0

Featured Post

Save on storage to protect fatherhood memories

You're the dad who has everything. This Father's Day, make sure your family memories are protected. My Passport Ultra has automatic backup and password protection to keep your cherished photos and videos safe. With up to 3TB, you have plenty of room to hold the adventures ahead.

Join & Write a Comment

In this article we have discussed the manual scenarios to recover data from Windows 10 through some backup and recovery tools which are offered by it.
Learn about cloud computing and its benefits for small business owners.
This video Micro Tutorial explains how to clone a hard drive using a commercial software product for Windows systems called Casper from Future Systems Solutions (FSS). Cloning makes an exact, complete copy of one hard disk drive (HDD) onto another d…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…

772 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

11 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now