Solved

Linux, RHEL 6.2 differences

Posted on 2012-04-03
5
441 Views
Last Modified: 2012-04-04
I ran the same software package on both RHEL 5.6 and RHEL 6.2

Both RHEL 5.6 and RHEL 6.2 use a default of 1024 for the number of processes a user is allowed

The software worked in RHEL 5.6 and not RHEL 6.2

However, when I increased the number processes a user is allowed in limits.conf, (I did a reboot since I had started processes from this user), the software all of a sudeen started working properly

So why did increasing the number of processes in RHEL 6.2 work, since both RHEL 5.6 and RHEL 6.2 have the same number of default processes?
0
Comment
Question by:Los Angeles1
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:Los Angeles1
ID: 37801804
Did the futex change come in RHEL 6.x, could that be part of the issue
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:legolasthehansy
ID: 37801956
Is the under lying architecture of both the servers same? (check using uname -m)
Your application must be using more processes which would need to be checked..

ps -ef | grep <app> | wc -l (on both servers)
0
 

Author Comment

by:Los Angeles1
ID: 37802066
On RHEL 5.x I had about 20 processes

On RHEL 6.2 I had over a thousand, but then I increased the number of users and the number of processes decrease to about 32

So yes, the architecture of the 2 OS's are different

Can anyone speculate as to how RHEL 5.x and 6.x are different in this regard ?
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:legolasthehansy
ID: 37802165
What is the s/w package?
How did you decrease the number of process from 'over a thousand' to 32?

Just trying to get more info.
0
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
arnold earned 500 total points
ID: 37804000
Depending on what your app does,mthe default config seems to have limited what processing it needed to perform such that all the incoming tasks were queuing up unable to be completed. I.e. a race condition where to compete a process it needs four resources, but at any one time there were only three available until you change increasing the available resources to four.

5 and 6 are different in kernel, as well as other packages. There is no direct upgrade path from 5 to 6 because of the many differences.
Presumably both are of similar architecture 32 or 64 bit.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I am a long time windows user and for me it is normal to have spaces in directory and file names. Changing to Linux I found myself frustrated when I moved my windows data over to my new Linux computer. The problem occurs when at the command line.…
Over the last ten+ years I have seen Linux configuration tools come and go. In the early days there was the tried-and-true, all-powerful linuxconf that many thought would remain the one and only Linux configuration tool until the end of times. Well,…
Learn how to get help with Linux/Unix bash shell commands. Use help to read help documents for built in bash shell commands.: Use man to interface with the online reference manuals for shell commands.: Use man to search man pages for unknown command…
Learn how to navigate the file tree with the shell. Use pwd to print the current working directory: Use ls to list a directory's contents: Use cd to change to a new directory: Use wildcards instead of typing out long directory names: Use ../ to move…
Suggested Courses

635 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question