Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 434
  • Last Modified:

Variable Pictures in MS Word 2007/2010

I have an application that uses MS Word (2007 & 2010) for mail merges.  What I want is to embed a dynamic photo based on a field in the datasource.   The field contains a url to the end users photo.  ie.  FieldName: photolocation
Field Value  http://www.hostingsite/user.jpg

I have used the following without success.

{INCLUDEPICTURE "{IF TRUE { MERGEFIELD «photolocation» }}"}

Result:   Displays "http://www.hostingsite/user.jpg" and not the embedded picture.

Explicit Example  (tried with and without quotes around URL:
{INCLUDEPICTURE "{IF TRUE { "http://www.hostingsite/user.jpg” }}"}

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
0
ulcsupport
Asked:
ulcsupport
  • 3
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
Philippe DamervalSenior Analyst ProgrammerCommented:
Hi,
There is a bug in Word 2007/2010 that Microsoft is aware of regarding the IncludePicture field. If you save your document as a word 97-2003 file, you will get better results.
Also, make sure all the pointers and details from this link:
http://wordnut.hubpages.com/hub/IncludePicture
are taken into account. I have just run an example using some random images from a google search, and it seems to work. The doubling up of the slashes is important.

HTH,

Philippe
0
 
GrahamSkanCommented:
It's not clear what the IF field is there for. Try this:

{INCLUDEPICTURE “{ MERGEFIELD «photolocation» }”}
0
 
GrahamSkanCommented:
Sorry. I have mixed up the views.

It should just be
{INCLUDEPICTURE “«photolocation»”}

or with the Mergefield code displayed:
{INCLUDEPICTURE “{ MERGEFIELD photolocation }”}
0
Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
ulcsupportAuthor Commented:
I was able to find a solution to this.   The coding solutions were correct,  however, it was necessary to do a CRL-A to select all fields and then F9 to update the merge fields.   This worked only when saving in Word 2003 format.  I was not successful getting this to work in Office 2007/2010, apparently due to a known bug.
0
 
GrahamSkanCommented:
The merge process itself should automatically update fields, so I doubt that was the real answer, though it may account for the strange-looking field codes that you reported in the question.

What bug prevents merge from working in Word 2007?  Perhaps we can find a workaround.
0
 
ulcsupportAuthor Commented:
I was able to find a solution to this.   The coding solutions were correct,  however, it was necessary to do a CRL-A to select all fields and then F9 to update the merge fields.   This worked only when saving in Word 2003 format.  I was not successful getting this to work in Office 2007/2010, apparently due to a known bug.
0

Featured Post

New feature and membership benefit!

New feature! Upgrade and increase expert visibility of your issues with Priority Questions.

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now