Solved

Slow Speed Tests - Perc6i + 8 x 1.5TB RAID 10

Posted on 2012-04-03
3
765 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
Hey guys

Got a a Dual Quad Core 32GB Server
Perc6i with BBU
8 x 1.5TB WD RE4 RAID 10
Filesystem: EXT4
Strip: 64K

Its running slow or these commands are wrong, any help would be appreciated

root@svr1:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/sdb1

/dev/sdb1:
 Timing cached reads:   14932 MB in  2.00 seconds = 7473.84 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads: 682 MB in  3.00 seconds = 227.30 MB/sec
root@svr1:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdb1


root@svr1:~# dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 14.9253 s, 71.9 MB/s
0
Comment
Question by:nbrooky
3 Comments
 
LVL 55

Accepted Solution

by:
andyalder earned 250 total points
ID: 37805027
Looks reasonable to me for 7.2K disks.

227MB/s 64K blocksize = 3632 IOPS (far better than expected but it's sequential data so that's believable)

71MB/s 64K blocksize 1136 IOPS, again better than expected but again sequential data. Much worse than the previous but there again of=test is probably on the same disks so you're reading from the same thing you're writing to which makes for a lot more head movement.

What figures were you expecting?
0
 
LVL 47

Assisted Solution

by:dlethe
dlethe earned 250 total points
ID: 37805449
YOur performance will "double" if you use the bitbucket as source of the data instead of existing drives, i.e, use if=/dev/zero  
As Andyalder posted, the numbers you got are quite reasonable.   SATA disks and performance are somewhat mutually exclusive.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:nbrooky
ID: 37808879
Thanks guys totally forgot what I was testing here did think about block size of the writes :)
0

Featured Post

Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

The 6120xp switches seem to have a bug when you create a fiber port channel when you have a UCS fabric interconnects talking to them.  If you follow the Cisco guide for the UCS, the FC Port channel will never come up and it will say that there are n…
Moving your enterprise fax infrastructure from in-house fax machines and servers to the cloud makes sense — from both an efficiency and productivity standpoint. But does migrating to a cloud fax solution mean you will no longer be able to send or re…
Nobody understands Phishing better than an anti-spam company. That’s why we are providing Phishing Awareness Training to our customers. According to a report by Verizon, only 3% of targeted users report malicious emails to management. With compan…

831 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question