Dear experts,

f={(x,x2+1) | x ¿R)}

I have started learning mathematics on my own, hence these questions.

Also if anyone suggest any website where i could see tutorials on this topic.

thank you
###### Who is Participating?

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Author Commented:
dear experts,

there has been some script issue.

It should be read x 'belongs to' R.

thankyou
\Commented:
>> f={(x,x^2+1) | x is in R)}
Took liberty changing x2 to x-squared (is this right?)
This looks like a mapping of all x in R.
Given any point x in the x-axis (in R), then the corresponding point along the y-axis (also in R) is x-squared.
So, the function f is just a parabola: f(x) = x^2+1
\Commented:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_(mathematics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_(mathematics)#Image_of_a_set

(x,x^2+1) represents the set of points in R^2 defined by the function f(x) = x^2+1
Author Commented:
phorrric,

thank you fo rthe comment.

yes you are right it was x squared, i observed it much after i posted the question.

my frustation is this,

f={(x,x^2+1) | x is in R)}

if i rewrite the above function to this, am i missing anything

f={(x^2+1) | x is in R)}

Kindly comment.

Thank you.
\Commented:
This blog tries to discuss various forms of notation confusion:
http://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/domains-codomains-ranges-images-preimages-inverse-images/

From that blog and the previous links, I am inclined to take issue with your notation:  f={(x^2+1) | x is in R)}
It seems to be infering a mapping from R -> R as x -> x^2 + 1, but I think you need to be more explicit, as in:

f: R -> R, defined by { x -> (x^2+1) | x is in R) }
or,
f: R -> R, defined by x ->  x^2 + 1 or equivalently, f(x) = x^2 + 1
but, notationally, f(x), may be a little misleading, since, on one hand, f(x) is just a number, given a number x; yet, we have learned it in H.S. algebra that f(x) is a function. The blog tries to help clarify these points and relates algebra to set theory.

Paraphrasing from this blog and applying to your problem..
Given a function f: R -> R , we can define a natural notion of the graph of that function. It is the set of all points ( x, f(x) ) where x is an element in R. To put it another way, it is the set of all points (x, y) that are in R x R such that y = f(x) =  (x^2+1).

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by