Can a CAS server that participates in a CAS Array be on a different DAG?

Ok.  I have two sites.  Each site will have two multi-role Exchange 2010 SP2 servers.  I would like to have two two member DAGs (with DAC) because both sites have active users, and both sites would need to be protected from hardware failures/disasters.  The sites are connected by low latency, high bandwidth VPN.  If the connection between the sites fails, both sites need to be able to continue to have access to their mailboxes.  

My questions is this: can a server be a member of both a CAS array and a DAG, even if the CAS array is for a mailbox database that's on a different DAG?  

Below is a basic diagram of my design.  Will it work?  Are there any glaring problems to my design?  Any potential for problems?

Thanks in advance!
design-diagram
reuniontitleAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

netballiCommented:
Hi
the following link would help to understand about DAG. Also  the DAG only work with mailbox database server role hence CAS should work with all the exchange server with in an exchange organization.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979799.aspx
0
ash007Commented:
Yes you can have CAS array member of DAG
0
abdulalikhanCommented:
- For CAS array settings, yes you can have a CAS on a member of other DAG.

- In case of a site failure, you have to manually activate the DR it cannot be an automated process.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
reuniontitleAuthor Commented:
abdulalikhan,

can you elaborate on "- In case of a site failure, you have to manually activate the DR it cannot be an automated process."?

thanks!
0
abdulalikhanCommented:
In Case of Site '1' failure, DAG 'A' will be down as the majority is down but DAG 'B' will continue to work as Site '2' has the majority. To mount the databases for DAG 'A' and force clients who are member of DAG 'A' to use site 2 CAS you need to manually activate the DR. This cannot be an automated process.

I am sending links which tell the complete details of the DAG, failover and failback scenario. Jump to the part number for Failover and failback scenarios.

http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/planning-deploying-testing-exchange-2010-site-resilient-solution-sized-medium-organization-part1.html

http://port25.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/how-to-manage-a-datacenter-failure-or-disaster-recovery-scenario-in-exchange-2010-part-1/
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Exchange

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.