Apparent collision of square brackets in jQuery and Classic ASP

Hello Everyone,

I am not an ASP guru and I am writing some code in Classic ASP and trying to introduce jQuery. Most things work well, however I have a problem with square brackets messing with what I presume to be the ASP parser. Typically functions are called in brackets like [ADD_PAGEHEADER] or [ADD_FORMSTART]. The problem seems to be the brackets in the jQuery script (below) are trying to be interpreted by the ASP parser, I think.

<script>
      $('input[name=FeatureList]').change(function() {
            $("#cb").append("this is a test");
      });  
</script>

The script fails at the point where the jQuery script begins in an ASP processed page, but works fine in straight HTML. In the script jQuery above, radio buttons seem to be handled a little differently than many other form elements and the syntax is a little quirky.

Is there anyway to turn off the ASP parser during the running of this script or maybe some other workaround to the apparent collision of the brackets? I tried escaping out the brackets but that didn't work either.

Thanks in advance for your help.

HB
LVL 1
HumbleBeginningsAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Michel PlungjanIT ExpertCommented:
I would expect

 $("input[name='FeatureList']")

http://api.jquery.com/attribute-equals-selector/

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
YZlatCommented:
I think it should be

 $("#FeatureList").change(function() { 
            $("#cb").append("this is a test");
      });  

Open in new window

YZlatCommented:
or something like:

 
$("input[type='checkbox'][name='FeatureList']").change(function() { 
            $("#cb").append("this is a test");
      });  

Open in new window


or

 
$("input:checkbox[name='FeatureList']").change(function() { 
            $("#cb").append("this is a test");
      });  

Open in new window

OWASP: Threats Fundamentals

Learn the top ten threats that are present in modern web-application development and how to protect your business from them.

YZlatCommented:
Actually this should work fine:

 $('input[name="FeatureList"]').change(function() { 
            $("#cb").append("this is a test");
      });  

Open in new window

Michel PlungjanIT ExpertCommented:
Which is what I posted
YZlatCommented:
to be fair, you posted

 $("input[name='FeatureList']")

and I posted

$('input[name="FeatureList"]')
YZlatCommented:
and while yours modified the author's code, mine was simply wrapping FeatureList in double quotes
David S.Commented:
Whether one type of quotes are used on the inside as opposed to the outside makes no functional difference. You just have to make sure that you escape any that need escaping (which is not needed in this example).

I think it should be
$("#FeatureList")
An ID and a name are not the same. An ID must be unique, where as, especially with radio button groups, multiple form controls may have the same name.
Michel PlungjanIT ExpertCommented:
@YZlat: And this large amounts of unnecessary postings results in what? That we agree that the quotes are the issue?
I added the quotes to the selector - irrelevant which way the quotes are added as long as they are there. I modified them to my preference.
That does not make it less correct than a suggestion where I left the original quotes in place.

I agree with Kravimir - $("#...") is for ID and not for NAME. I did not want to pollute the question with even more posts so I did not mention it
YZlatCommented:
mplungjan, talking about polluting the post...
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
jQuery

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.