Solved

Hardware, SSD vs RAID

Posted on 2012-04-11
5
439 Views
Last Modified: 2012-04-11
In the current state of technology, which is fater and more dependable.  RAIDs or multi-head SSD's

Are SSD's pushing out RAIDs
0
Comment
Question by:Los Angeles1
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
5 Comments
 
LVL 17

Assisted Solution

by:Anuroopsundd
Anuroopsundd earned 100 total points
ID: 37833169
SSD still are smaller in size. max 250GB and really costly to implement.

SSD is definately much faster even faster then SCSI drive but due to above real implementation is not possible.

we can still have RAID in SSD.. so incase it SSD will come in bigger size and better cost or real critical environment SSD will be put in RAID...
It's all about data in the company and no one will want to have single point of failure even if it is SSD
0
 
LVL 8

Assisted Solution

by:JT92677
JT92677 earned 200 total points
ID: 37833288
Ask yourself:  Are SSD's 100% reliable?

If so, fine, but I seriously doubt it.  

RAID serves a different purpose than MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) information on some hardware.

For mission critical data, redundancy is a must.

Why not mix Raid with SSD, if price is not imporant ??

Keep smiling

Jeff
0
 
LVL 69

Assisted Solution

by:Callandor
Callandor earned 100 total points
ID: 37833407
There are Enterprise-class SSDs available, some of which are SSDs mounted as a RAID array on a PCI-e card (http://www.newegg.com/Store/SubCategory.aspx?SubCategory=2021&Tid=11691&name=Enterprise-SSD).  SSDs are not pushing out RAID; they are replacing hard drives.  They have access times of 0.1msec and sustained throughput of over 1000 MB/sec.  Some companies are using them as a cache for much larger data storage.

SSDs have special requirements, namely that if you want to optimize their use, you should implement some kind of wear leveling, since the NAND memory has a limited number of write cycles.  Win7 does this with TRIM; servers do it with a different approach: http://www.storagesearch.com/siliconsys-art1.html
0
 
LVL 55

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 100 total points
ID: 37833419
For real speed get PCIe NAND flash, e.g www.fusionio.com/platforms/iodrive-octal/ (some other makers doing them now). They're not cheap!
0
 
LVL 8

Accepted Solution

by:
JT92677 earned 200 total points
ID: 37833468
The write cycle limit mentioned by Callandor is one of the reasons I wouldn't jump on the SSD bandwagon.

Also, unless drive read/write is a major bottleneck in a system's performance, it is hard to justify increasing access time if the applications are not read/write intensive, like authoring publications, writing software, working on spreadsheets, doing e-mail, etc., pretty much all the things that typical users do. Fast access on servers might justify fast drives, but network speed may be the more important bottleneck, not drive access speed.

I like to see systems with lots of RAM so any virtual memory is not written to disk, but is in the memory cache, which is faster than SSD anyway.

Jeff
0

Featured Post

Building an interactive eFuture classroom

Watch and learn how ATEN provided a total control system solution including seamless switching matrix switch, HDBaseT extenders, PDU, lighting control to build an interactive eFuture classroom.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Bios update is not supported using rbu method 13 1,177
Martian Packets Unix 5 73
extra RAM sticks on server board 9 47
Solaris acount issues 44 45
Introduction Regular patching is part of a system administrator's tasks. However, many patches require that the system be in single-user mode before they can be installed. A cluster patch in particular can take quite a while to apply if the machine…
Using libpcap/Jpcap to capture and send packets on Solaris version (10/11) Library used: 1.      Libpcap (http://www.tcpdump.org) Version 1.2 2.      Jpcap(http://netresearch.ics.uci.edu/kfujii/Jpcap/doc/index.html) Version 0.6 Prerequisite: 1.      GCC …
Learn how to find files with the shell using the find and locate commands. Use locate to find a needle in a haystack.: With locate, check if the file still exists.: Use find to get the actual location of the file.:
In a previous video, we went over how to export a DynamoDB table into Amazon S3.  In this video, we show how to load the export from S3 into a DynamoDB table.

749 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question