?
Solved

Private class members in reflected class

Posted on 2012-04-12
3
Medium Priority
?
295 Views
Last Modified: 2012-04-16
Here:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/reflect/index.html
is a discussion of reflection. One part says:
Exposure of Internals
    Since reflection allows code to perform operations that would be illegal in non-reflective code, such as accessing private fields and methods, the use of reflection can result in unexpected side-effects, which may render code dysfunctional and may destroy portability. Reflective code breaks abstractions and therefore may change behavior with upgrades of the platform.

How and why does this happen? Why do class members lose their access modifier definition?
0
Comment
Question by:allelopath
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 19

Accepted Solution

by:
ramazanyich earned 1400 total points
ID: 37841541
IT is due to setAccessible API which is available in reflection APi.
lets say you have class:
public class PrivateObject {

  private String privateString = null;

  public PrivateObject(String privateString) {
    this.privateString = privateString;
  }
}

by usin reflection API you can get privateString value

Field privateStringField = PrivateObject.class.
            getDeclaredField("privateString");

privateStringField.setAccessible(true);

String fieldValue = (String) privateStringField.get(privateObject);
System.out.println("fieldValue = " + fieldValue);
0
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:ramazanyich
ID: 37841543
same setAccesible API is applicable for Method
0
 
LVL 12

Assisted Solution

by:Sharon Seth
Sharon Seth earned 600 total points
ID: 37841972
Reflective code breaks abstractions

Say the following is a property in your class and you have a setter for this property:

private List  items;

public void setItems(Map items)
{
   this.items = items;
}      

Here you have declared an abstraction over the underlying collection for items . The actual collection used can be any of the List implementations

When you go for reflection and try to access the setter on items , but items was assigned  an ArrayList , then the reflection mechanism would throw  NoSuchMethodException , clearly breaking the abstraction you had defined .
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

An old method to applying the Singleton pattern in your Java code is to check if a static instance, defined in the same class that needs to be instantiated once and only once, is null and then create a new instance; otherwise, the pre-existing insta…
Introduction This article is the first of three articles that explain why and how the Experts Exchange QA Team does test automation for our web site. This article explains our test automation goals. Then rationale is given for the tools we use to a…
Viewers learn about the third conditional statement “else if” and use it in an example program. Then additional information about conditional statements is provided, covering the topic thoroughly. Viewers learn about the third conditional statement …
The viewer will learn how to implement Singleton Design Pattern in Java.
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month13 days, 11 hours left to enroll

800 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question