jimmycher
asked on
ASA and Nat-Traversal option
Is there any reason you would turn off Nat-T on an ASA?
If it's on, and you don't use it, then no-harm-no-foul, right?
I ask because we get much different failures when we turn on NAT-T (i.e no connection), versus when we have it turned off (then we get IPSEC, but no data flow)
If it's on, and you don't use it, then no-harm-no-foul, right?
I ask because we get much different failures when we turn on NAT-T (i.e no connection), versus when we have it turned off (then we get IPSEC, but no data flow)
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
I took the liberty of adding the Cisco PIX/ASA and VPN zones to your question to see if we can get the attention of some additional experts.
ASKER
Enabling Nat-T fixed the problem the second time around; unknown what happened the first time when it didn't work. Thanks.