Avatar of codevu
Flag for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland asked on

Windows Server 2003 - support lifecycle

Hi all,

A quick question:

Windows Server 2003 - Mainstream support ends 07/2010
Windows Server 2003 - Mainstream support ends 07/2015

By all accounts complete support from MS ends 2015.

So if a supplier is using EOSL as an excuse for performance should they offer 2003 as a replacement when that excuse can be used in 3 years? Although Server 2008 is 2018.

Just curious, thanks.

They should be offering
Windows Server 2003

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Alan Hardisty

8/22/2022 - Mon
Alan Hardisty

Can you please explain more about the excuse being used and the reasons / reasons behind it.

If you have 2003 server and are having performance issues, that may be because Windows 2003 Server can only use 4Gb of memory due to it being a 32-Bit OS, unless that is of course, you have the 64-bit version.

4Gb might run most things well, but I have some customers with 4Gb Windows 2003 servers and they are mildly painful at best.

Indeed there could be many reasons -

We have a few W2K servers - EOSL is used as the excuse and all they is we should upgrade them to 2003.

It is how it is, they should still try to figure out whats happening to the W2K systems when they are paid to support them.

However, this query is... there advise is to upgrade to 2003 - but that will be EOSL in a few years so how is that a good thing? Project could take to 2013 before they'd be installed etc.

Are people still offering 2003 as part of a refresh, or is it 2008 etc?
Alan Hardisty

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question

Luckily, the support company covering these W2K servers were the ones who installed it.

It's becoming a tired excuse. They should still be supporting it - they get paid to :) Understandably things can be difficult but they should still offer checks if something goes wrong.

So if it not 2003, would you say 2008? (high level, compatibility items would be part of project etc)
Experts Exchange is like having an extremely knowledgeable team sitting and waiting for your call. Couldn't do my job half as well as I do without it!
James Murphy
Log in to continue reading
Log In
Sign up - Free for 7 days
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.