I have a SPD 2010 workflow that needs to do two consecutive updates to a list.
The updates a to different items in the list.
The workflow does the first update to the list but unless I add a 1 minute pause after the first update, it fails to do the socond update.
The main problem is that althought the pause is set for 1 minute, it can take as much as five minutes before the second update, I believe this is due to the Timer Job running every 5 minutes.
Is there any way I can decrease the timer job so that it runs at a shorter interval?
Will that cause any problems with the rest of the site?
I have changed to 1 minute and now the longest it takes to complete is 1 minute and 20 seconds more or less.
I still don't understand why I must place a pause between the updates, I cant find any info on the web about it. Surelly SPD should be able to handle consecutive updates to the same list if the items updated are on different rows.
colly92002
It's probably forcing the pause so it doesn't hit any concurrency/deadlock issues. Workflows are notorious for that sort of thing, so it's taking a "safety first" approach.
I have changed to 1 minute and now the longest it takes to complete is 1 minute and 20 seconds more or less.
I still don't understand why I must place a pause between the updates, I cant find any info on the web about it. Surelly SPD should be able to handle consecutive updates to the same list if the items updated are on different rows.