MSTP configuration between Core and Distribution block of a network

Regarding this topic, we are experiencing problems in my company because of different spanning-tree modes in Core and Distribution blocks so we want to migrate to a topology with MSTP protocol in all the network and I attach a map with a reduced version or our network including extracts of the MSTP configuration for every block.

We are going to use 3 regions:
WAN. It contains one instance for the vlan that interconnect Core with WAN routers (Internet in network map)
DIST. It contains one instance for the vlan that interconnect Core with Distribution Layer3 switches.
ACC. It contains 2 instances with the final user vlans.

The Core equipment uses only WAN and DIST regions, the Distribution equipment uses only DIST and ACC regions and the Access equipment uses only ACC region.

The main doubt we have is if it makes sense that we use a dedicated region for the network that interconnect Core and Distribution equipment. Is it going to work properly without loops?. Is there any other possibility more efficient? (the same situation applies to the network between Core and WAN routers).

Thank you very much for your help.

P.D. We understand that it's not necessary to include ACC region in Core equipment since the final user vlans are configured in Distribution equipment but not in Core. Do you agree?
MSTP-Core-Dist.jpg
eltenista10Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
Don JohnstonConnect With a Mentor InstructorCommented:
The last doubt I have is to know if I can configure in a switch a SMTP instance associated with a vlan which is not configured at layer 2 level in that switch

No. IIRC, you'll get an error message when you try to associate a non-existing VLAN with an MST instance.
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Why do you want separate regions?

Typically, if you want to limit the spanning tree domain, you would use a layer 3 device (like your distribution switches).
0
 
eltenista10Author Commented:
But between Core and Distribution equipment there are as well redundant links with possibility of loops so I think we would have to use any spanning-tree protocol to achieve that "Core1" is the root for vlan25 (see map).

Assuming this and that we have used SMTP in Distribution equipment, I think that it's mandatory to use as well SMTP in Core equipment but I'm not sure. If that's correct, I see logical to configure a region that contains only this vlan 25 which interconnects Core-Distribution.

However I'm not sure if this solution would work properly and stable or if there are other possibilities more efficient that you could provide. Thanks a lot.
0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Why do you want to have separate regions? Why not use a single region?
0
 
eltenista10Author Commented:
Yes, we have thought about the possibility of configuring in all the switches of the network the same region, for example:

spanning-tree mst configuration
 name MyRegion
 revision 1
 instance 5 vlan 1,5
 instance 15 vlan 10,15
 instance 25 vlan 25
 instance 30 vlan 30
!

However, it means that we have to configure in Core equipment instances of SMTP that include final user vlans (1,5,10,15) which are not configured in Core equipment but in Distribution and Access equipment.

Likewise, it also means configuring in access switches instances with vlan 25 or 30 which are defined in Distribution or Core blocks. Is that correct?. I think this can cause problems in the network...
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
I would either configure MSTP the same in all switches or make the layer 2 boundary at the distribution switches and route traffic to the core.
0
 
eltenista10Author Commented:
In case of making layer 2 boundary at the distribution switches, which type of spanning-tree should we configure in Core equipment to achieve that CORE1 is root for vlan25 (interconnect Distribution-Core)?

We maybe are going to test with a single SMTP region for the entire network but, do you think the other solution with 3 regions should work fine as well?. Thanks.
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
I think that using three regions is unnecessarily complicated. Which will make troubleshooting significantly more difficult.  But it will work.

If you put the L2 boundary at the distribution layer, I would do layer 3 above that (no STP). Let the routing protocol handle path selection.
0
 
eltenista10Author Commented:
OK, thank you very much for your help Don.

The last doubt I have is to know if I can configure in a switch a SMTP instance associated with a vlan which is not configured at layer 2 level in that switch. For example the vlan 4 in the following configuration:

spanning-tree mst configuration
 name MyRegion
 revision 1
 instance 1 vlan 1,2
 instance 2 vlan 3,4
!

myswitchl3# sh vlan brief

VLAN Name                             Status    
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------
1    default                               active    
2   MyVLAN2                            active    
3   MyVLAN3                            active
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.