VPN vs, MPLS connectivity

I have a non -critical network resource that is currently riding over an 100M pipe to a MPLS cloud.
I was considering just connecting that resource to the network by VPN as a cost savings. In your estimation would this be a cost effective solution to a dedicated connection into the cloud?
Phoenix43Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
Matt VConnect With a Mentor Commented:
I have never used them before.  Maybe another expert can comment?
0
 
atrevidoCommented:
Let me restate your question to see if I understand what you are asking - you want to get rid of a 100 MB MPLS pipe to a non-critical network resource and change it to VPN over public internet (some connection yet TBD) to save money.  Is that correct?

If that is correct then I guess you have to ask yourself what connection speed you will have/need for that resource and will it be enough.  I would imagine any internet latency won't be an issue because it isn't VoIP or video.  So, I would say yes its doable, it will probably save you $ depending on what you put in its place and it would be secure.  There are always security types out there that are totally paranoid and will say its not enough but if you set your encryption to the max, big long complex passwords you should be fine.
Does that 100 MB MPLS have a contract?  They usually do.  Is yours expiring or do you not have an ETF?
0
 
Matt VCommented:
A non-critical application is the perfect place to use a VPN over MPLS.  If you were doing voice or video then MPLS is definately the way to go.
0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

 
Phoenix43Author Commented:
Yeah,  no VOIP or vid.
What might be the best VPN appliance to go for???  I wanted to terminate VPN connectivity to the firewall but leadership prefers an appliance
0
 
Matt VCommented:
Cisco ASA is a great VPN appliance.  But any business class router or firewall should work.
0
 
atrevidoCommented:
I am partial to the Cisco 5500 ASA
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/prod_brochure0900aecd80402e39.html

You can use a vmware VPN appliance thru there solutions exchange but if it were MY network there is no way I would do that, but hey...it's cheap.

I hate Juniper, so I wouldn't use that, I have a client with a couple of those and every time you want to change or do something its a call to product support.  Horror show....set up is insane.
0
 
Phoenix43Author Commented:
While I wait for a security resource perhaps you can advise me on best practice . My question is I have a sales force that I want to exclude from various network domains, servers etc. I know that I can terminate my VPN connectivity to a ASA 5510 lets say.
However, If cost were not a huge issue would it not be best to go with a VPN Concentrator into the Environment
That said what may be a suitable concentrator to handle this task??
0
 
Matt VCommented:
The ASA replaces the older VPN concentrators, it can handle the VPNs and gives you more access control.  I would stick with the ASA.
0
 
Phoenix43Author Commented:
What are your thoughts on Palo Alto?
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.