• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 407
  • Last Modified:

ZFS on Nextenta vm, configuration ... slow performance

Hi,

So I configured a Nextenta vm on my ESXi 5.1, it runs on a local SSD of the ESXi.
Added 3 of 4 ssd's in Sharkoon via raw mapping to the vm (4th is not seen, probably esata cable loosened, have to check that).

Created a NFS zraid with these 3 SSD's and put 1 vm on it.
nextenta
Not what I expected, honestly. Ok, it's a vm (Nextenta) but still disks are mapped directly, memory is not used heavily .... Performance of 1 SSD is faster then this ZFS ZRAID.

Shouldn't I use ISCSI or caching, or logs ...?

Am I missing something?

Please advise.
J.
0
janhoedt
Asked:
janhoedt
  • 7
  • 6
1 Solution
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
what's the performance? can you give us some values?
0
 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
Where should I get the values from? Please advise.
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Benchmark and test.
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
You mentioned some tools to do this (portable ones I think), could you mention them again? I'll then run these and paste the results here.
0
 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
Btw, does it (ZFS Nextenta) get faster when you use it longer, even without cache configured? Seems to be so ....
0
 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
Loading nextenta volume with vm's now.
Note: could configuring ISCSI bring improvement versus NFS?
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Napp-it contains Bonnie and DD benchmark tests, which will perform the tests actually on the NAS.

Others include I/O Meter, CrystaldiskMark, HD Tach
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
iSCSI could be faster than NFS, again benchmark and test, check with Jumbo Frames enabled and disabled.
0
 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
Nappit? Its not installed, should I?
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
if you are going to run Bonnie and DD tests.

what benchmarks do you have for you existing NAS?
0
 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
I cannot use jumbo frames since not all my devices support it. Afain, I just needed a blackbox fast nas, nothing more, nothing less.
I ll follow the config you made and tested. Don t need or want to spend to much time anymore testing/configuring.
My lsi should arrive soon, I ll order 3 2tb disks and will install solaris with nappit on bare metal then. Can you share your config/help me further configuring then? When finished I hope not to need to touch anymore and focus again on vms/windows no storage anymore.
0
 
janhoedtAuthor Commented:
Fyi: performance overview OpenIndiana, Solaris & Nexenta: http://blog.b3n.org/2011/12/solaris-11-openindiana-and-nexentastor.html
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Yes, as I've maintained ZFS in Oracle Solaris has always been the best for performance.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 7
  • 6
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now