ZFS on Nextenta vm, configuration ... slow performance

janhoedt
janhoedt used Ask the Experts™
on
Hi,

So I configured a Nextenta vm on my ESXi 5.1, it runs on a local SSD of the ESXi.
Added 3 of 4 ssd's in Sharkoon via raw mapping to the vm (4th is not seen, probably esata cable loosened, have to check that).

Created a NFS zraid with these 3 SSD's and put 1 vm on it.
nextenta
Not what I expected, honestly. Ok, it's a vm (Nextenta) but still disks are mapped directly, memory is not used heavily .... Performance of 1 SSD is faster then this ZFS ZRAID.

Shouldn't I use ISCSI or caching, or logs ...?

Am I missing something?

Please advise.
J.
Comment
Watch Question

Do more with

Expert Office
EXPERT OFFICE® is a registered trademark of EXPERTS EXCHANGE®
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE Fellow)VMware and Virtualization Consultant
Fellow 2018
Expert of the Year 2017

Commented:
what's the performance? can you give us some values?

Author

Commented:
Where should I get the values from? Please advise.
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE Fellow)VMware and Virtualization Consultant
Fellow 2018
Expert of the Year 2017

Commented:
Benchmark and test.
Success in ‘20 With a Profitable Pricing Strategy

Do you wonder if your IT business is truly profitable or if you should raise your prices? Learn how to calculate your overhead burden using our free interactive tool and use it to determine the right price for your IT services. Start calculating Now!

Author

Commented:
You mentioned some tools to do this (portable ones I think), could you mention them again? I'll then run these and paste the results here.

Author

Commented:
Btw, does it (ZFS Nextenta) get faster when you use it longer, even without cache configured? Seems to be so ....

Author

Commented:
Loading nextenta volume with vm's now.
Note: could configuring ISCSI bring improvement versus NFS?
VMware and Virtualization Consultant
Fellow 2018
Expert of the Year 2017
Commented:
Napp-it contains Bonnie and DD benchmark tests, which will perform the tests actually on the NAS.

Others include I/O Meter, CrystaldiskMark, HD Tach
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE Fellow)VMware and Virtualization Consultant
Fellow 2018
Expert of the Year 2017

Commented:
iSCSI could be faster than NFS, again benchmark and test, check with Jumbo Frames enabled and disabled.

Author

Commented:
Nappit? Its not installed, should I?
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE Fellow)VMware and Virtualization Consultant
Fellow 2018
Expert of the Year 2017

Commented:
if you are going to run Bonnie and DD tests.

what benchmarks do you have for you existing NAS?

Author

Commented:
I cannot use jumbo frames since not all my devices support it. Afain, I just needed a blackbox fast nas, nothing more, nothing less.
I ll follow the config you made and tested. Don t need or want to spend to much time anymore testing/configuring.
My lsi should arrive soon, I ll order 3 2tb disks and will install solaris with nappit on bare metal then. Can you share your config/help me further configuring then? When finished I hope not to need to touch anymore and focus again on vms/windows no storage anymore.

Author

Commented:
Fyi: performance overview OpenIndiana, Solaris & Nexenta: http://blog.b3n.org/2011/12/solaris-11-openindiana-and-nexentastor.html
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE Fellow)VMware and Virtualization Consultant
Fellow 2018
Expert of the Year 2017

Commented:
Yes, as I've maintained ZFS in Oracle Solaris has always been the best for performance.

Do more with

Expert Office
Submit tech questions to Ask the Experts™ at any time to receive solutions, advice, and new ideas from leading industry professionals.

Start 7-Day Free Trial