Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.
block level vs. file level
Could someone give (or reference a source) that explains the difference between block level and file level storage of data, in simplest possible terms?
Who is Participating?
in short: 1 file is stored using 1 or more blocks (depending on the size).
when doing a incremental or differential backup, when a file has changed, you can do
* a full file backup (all the blocks of the file)
* a backup of just the blocks that have changed ...
this is a good backup "compression" method if you have large files which don't change all at once, but only partially.
when doing a incremental or differential backup, when a file has changed, you can do
* a full file backup (all the blocks of the file)
* a backup of just the blocks that have changed ...
this is a good backup "compression" method if you have large files which don't change all at once, but only partially.
Block level backup is normaly usined in a image backup where the entire partition is backed up as one file compared to a file backup where each file is backed up one at a time. Both have their pros and cons.
We use Backup Exec for all server backups and Windows Backup for workstations.
File backups are normally more flexible as you can restore a single file. Image backups normally only allow the entire partition restore. Frommy experience with apps like Ghost yers ago, they normally perform Image backups.
We use Backup Exec for all server backups and Windows Backup for workstations.
File backups are normally more flexible as you can restore a single file. Image backups normally only allow the entire partition restore. Frommy experience with apps like Ghost yers ago, they normally perform Image backups.
When most people talk about file or block they do this in terms of storage. File level is just that, it's accessed as file. The protocol that is typically used is NFS/CIFS (SMB windows NTFS,etc.). Normally access for file is a NAS type of device
Block is the underlying storage and is accessed via Fibre Channel, iSCSI, Fibre Channel over Ethernet, etc.. Block storage is typically accessed via direct storage such as an volume from a disk array or a LUN from a SAN device.
What are you trying to implement or looking into?
Block is the underlying storage and is accessed via Fibre Channel, iSCSI, Fibre Channel over Ethernet, etc.. Block storage is typically accessed via direct storage such as an volume from a disk array or a LUN from a SAN device.
What are you trying to implement or looking into?
Just trying to implement some NAS storage, it gives the option to utilize block level or file level , and I needed more infomation about it in order to decide: Thanks all, very informative and you have all helped.
Question has a verified solution.
Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.
Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.
All Courses
From novice to tech pro — start learning today.
NTbackup had this "incremental" or "differential" variations, which I won't attempt to explain here. Wbadmin does something similiar, but it is invisable. It compares the prior bits on the backup target with the current bits on the source and only copies the changed ones. So "incremental" backups with Server 2008 and later are usually very fast and can be done several times during an average work day. (Shadow Copies, another topic for another time.)