Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1965
  • Last Modified:

Cisco 6509 err-disabled

we have recently had issues with our 6509 were about 12 ports in our blade went in to err-disabled mode. for some reason the syslog didn't give me much info. I have to give an explaination on how this happened. I figured it has to deal with excessive collisions on the back plane, that why all the ports went in to err-disabled mode at the same time? but i have no proof of this. I brought the ports down and back up and it brought them out of err-disabled mode. but im hessitent to plug any servers in to those ports. the chaise is around 8 years so they are defiantly dated.. any theories and thoughts are always welcome
0
mattlast
Asked:
mattlast
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
1 Solution
 
Ken BooneNetwork ConsultantCommented:
Well don't know why, but if you plug something into those ports and those ports go err-disabled, it will show a log message as to why the port went err-disabled.  So unless you plug something in to those ports and watch the logs you probably won't know why they went err-disabled.
0
 
akhalighiCommented:
do you have port security enabled ? this usually happens if port security is configured and triggered . any recent acclivity that could change MAC addresses ? ( e.g. NIC card change on ESX servers , etc..)
0
 
akhalighiCommented:
What do you get if you tye this command for one of those interfaces ?

show port-security interface fa 0/1

do you see any violation counters ?
0
Prepare for your VMware VCP6-DCV exam.

Josh Coen and Jason Langer have prepared the latest edition of VCP study guide. Both authors have been working in the IT field for more than a decade, and both hold VMware certifications. This 163-page guide covers all 10 of the exam blueprint sections.

 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
What type of line card? There are some line cards where there is one ASIC which services 12 ports. Although I've never heard of an internal (ASIC or backplane) errdisabling ports.

What were the ports in question connected to? Are the ports part of an etherchannel group? Are they connected to one device? Is port security enabled? There are a number of things that can cause a port to go error disable. What is your current logging level?

Could you post the config (at the very least for the ports in question).
0
 
rauenpcCommented:
show int status err-disable can show more details on why it went to an err-disabled state.

Setting errdisable recovery can at least give the ports a chance to automatically attempt to go back to a normal status. The interval shown is the default, and that can change either direction. I wouldn't go less than a minute because, depending on the error, this could cause more problems than solve.

errdisable recovery cause udld
errdisable recovery cause bpduguard
errdisable recovery cause security-violation
errdisable recovery cause channel-misconfig
errdisable recovery cause pagp-flap
errdisable recovery cause dtp-flap
errdisable recovery cause link-flap
errdisable recovery cause psecure-violation
errdisable recovery cause gbic-invalid
errdisable recovery cause dhcp-rate-limit
errdisable recovery cause vmps
errdisable recovery cause loopback
errdisable recovery interval 300
0
 
mattlastAuthor Commented:
These are server ports in a secured room so there was no port security set at the time. don't ask why........

I was just given a secondary syslog list what reported the following

2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning X.X.X.X 1229277: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/25, putting Fa8/25 in err-disable state

this happen to 11 ports

there was a second error
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.critical X.X.X.X  1229293: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 8 is experiencing the following error: LTL Parity error detected on Coil #2.


the full log look like this
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229277: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/25, putting Fa8/25 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229278: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/26, putting Fa8/26 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229279: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/27, putting Fa8/27 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229280: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/28, putting Fa8/28 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229281: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/29, putting Fa8/29 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229282: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229283: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/31, putting Fa8/31 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229284: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/32, putting Fa8/32 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229285: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/33, putting Fa8/33 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229286: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/34, putting Fa8/34 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229287: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/35, putting Fa8/35 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229288: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/36, putting Fa8/36 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229289: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/27, putting Fa8/27 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229290: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/28, putting Fa8/28 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229291: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/29, putting Fa8/29 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229292: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.critical x.x.x.x 1229293: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 8 is experiencing the following error: LTL Parity error detected on Coil #2.
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229294: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/25, putting Fa8/25 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229295: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/26, putting Fa8/26 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229296: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/27, putting Fa8/27 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229297: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/28, putting Fa8/28 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229298: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/29, putting Fa8/29 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:51 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229299: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/30, putting Fa8/30 in err-disabl
2012-12-24 21:29:52 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229300: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/31, putting Fa8/31 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:52 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229301: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/32, putting Fa8/32 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:52 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229302: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/33, putting Fa8/33 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:52 local7.warning x.x.x.x 1229303: Dec 24 22:29:51: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/34, putting Fa8/34 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:52 local7.warning x.x.x.x  1229304: Dec 24 22:29:52: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/35, putting Fa8/35 in err-disable state
2012-12-24 21:29:52 local7.warning x.x.x.x  1229305: Dec 24 22:29:52: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: packet-buffer error detected on Fa8/36, putting Fa8/36 in err-disable state



As you can see based on the timestamp didnt make for a fun christmas ahah....
0
 
rauenpcCommented:
Bummer on the timestamps. I've seen these before, and we ended up getting the module replaced via TAC RMA. We had dozens of the same line cards in our data center that ended up getting replaced for this type of error. At the time we were told it was a hardware issue, but later I heard rumor that it turned out to be a software issue.

If you have smartnet, I would definitely start a TAC case.
0
 
mattlastAuthor Commented:
thanks i will bring it up in my next meeting any other ideas or similar exp. out there...
0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Add Premium security features to your question to ensure its privacy or anonymity. Learn more about your ability to control Question Security today.

  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now