?
Solved

Store results in memory instead of each time writing results in sheet(cell).

Posted on 2012-12-27
3
Medium Priority
?
203 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-11
Dear,

I'm including some accuracy control mechanism in a simulation Tool I build to re-rate made mobile calls.

The tool has a "control modus". If selected, the result (in this case the duration of the call ) is written in the current selected row offset by 18 colums.

When rerating +100K rows, and even with screenupdating and calc disabled, it runs very slow.

Is there a possibility to keep results in the memory (array), and only write the result once, once all rerating has been done.

Select Case ControlModus
    Case Is = "YES", "Yes", "yes"
        ActiveCell.Offset(0, 18).Value = CdrSeconds ' uncomment this in case you want to write control figures next to CDR's
    Case Else
End Select

Open in new window


Thank you for your help
/Xtophe
0
Comment
Question by:Xtophe_S
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
clarkscott earned 750 total points
ID: 38723465
Well... putting values on spreadsheet is, virtually, maintaining values in an array (since these values are in memory).   With +100k rows... and understanding how Excel maintains row data in memory... you're probably better off using the spreadsheet method versus memory arrays.  

But, depending on how you use this data in your application... you may want to write your data to a sheet like a table (1st row contains headers, all other rows contain data) and access your data on the sheet by opening it like a table and query your data using SQL type statements.

Scott C
0
 
LVL 85

Assisted Solution

by:Rory Archibald
Rory Archibald earned 750 total points
ID: 38723505
Writing 100k cells one by one will be very very slow, so yes you would be far better off writing the results to an array and then writing that to the sheet in one go using a simple:
Range("Y1").Resize(ubound(myarray, 1), ubound(myarray, 2)).Value = myArray

Open in new window


syntax
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:Faustulus
ID: 38726144
Have you considered setting Application.ScreenUpdating = False?
The effect would be that no time is spent on updating your screen. Hence, all data are kept in arrays managed by Excel which, arguably, should not be slower than using arrays managed by the user.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

After seeing numerous questions for Dynamic Data Validation I notice that most have used Visual Basic to solve the problem. This suggestion is purely formula based and can be used in multiple rows.
If you need to forecast numbers -- typically for finance -- the Windows and Mac versions of Excel 2016 have a basket of tools to get the job done.
The viewer will learn how to use the =DISCRINV command to create a discrete random variable, use this command to model a set of probabilities and outcomes in a Monte Carlo simulation, and learn how to find the standard deviation of a set of probabil…
This Micro Tutorial demonstrates how to create Excel charts: column, area, line, bar, and scatter charts. Formatting tips are provided as well.

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question