IP Address redesign

Posted on 2012-12-28
Last Modified: 2012-12-28
We currently have a network of which gives us We have another remote location through site to site vpn that uses and a 3rd site to site that uses We are running out of IPs and trying to decide what is best. We are considering setting up a vlan for each department and giving them their own block of IPs. We are considering supernetting the 192.168 network for all departments. Each department would have 512 addresses. for one, for another,, etc. Are there any potential problems with doing this? Is it better to subnet a class a or b using or or will it not matter. It will be substantially easier to stay with due to the fact that much less will need changed in order to do that.

I am trying to come up with a plan that is best for the next 30 years and that will be easiest to implement. Any ideas?
Question by:Wyandotte
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

rharland2009 earned 500 total points
ID: 38727285
The 512-address per department is a sound design - as long as you know you'll never exceed those seat numbers. When you say you're 'running out of IPs' I take that to mean that your /24 locations are getting bigger, since you'd like to stay at the /23 for your main location.
If you'd like to future-proof yourself a bit, put some space in between your location IP assignments. Like this:

This way, you could greatly expand these segments at a future date without bumping into the network boundary of the other locations. Just a thought.

As far as what class you use, it doesn't matter in the private space.

Author Comment

ID: 38727328
I am running out of space at all locations and I don't think I should go over 512 hosts per vlan. I could leave the data center at and that will be enough addresses for this building for quite some time. There are only about 70 being used right now. I could then open up the remote site that is to include the .2.0 which will double their IPs and then give them several subnets after that for room to grow. What is the maximum number of hosts per network. We don't need to vlan for security, I just thought I shouldn't go over 512 hosts per network. Am I wrong in thinking that?
LVL 11

Expert Comment

ID: 38727358
Back in the day, flat networks were terrible just because of the chattiness of broadcast traffic due to DHCP, etc.. Is it that much of a dealbreaker today? Most likely not, but your 512-host limit is still a good practice.
I like your idea of enveloping the .2 into your .3. That's what I did the last time I had to redesign at a shop.
Lots of opinions out there...
Portable, direct connect server access

The ATEN CV211 connects a laptop directly to any server allowing you instant access to perform data maintenance and local operations, for quick troubleshooting, updating, service and repair.


Author Comment

ID: 38727366
I read that thread when I was google searching the topic. I wanted to get an opinion on here. I think we will go that route. thanks.
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:Aaron Tomosky
ID: 38727400
Another suggestion: if your users ever VPN, it can cause issues if you use 192.168.0 or .1 as most all consumer routers are default to or I'd either stay off those two or just move up to 10.

Author Comment

ID: 38727512
We have a Cisco vpn currently with a few dozen users and don't have any problems.
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:Aaron Tomosky
ID: 38727602
If you have a server at the office with an ip of and your user is at home and their dhcp range starts at and their media server or whatever is at then I think they can't reach your server.

Author Comment

ID: 38727629
Correct, but most home networks start their IPs at 100 and our servers are all below that. Thanks for the tip though.
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:Fred Marshall
ID: 38727671
I would consider breaking it up so that you have actual subnet boundaries.  At least, at times, this simplifies setting up routers, firewalls, etc.

Then you would use:

This way the subnets not only do not overlap but can be increased in size to /21 in some fashion while maintaining the ability to use CIDR notation such as:
And each subnet can be referred to as:

If you choose other boundaries then you can't use this notation to refer to an entire subnet - should you choose to make one larger later on.

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Setup small office network 1 58
BGP Local Preference 5 48
Personal Secured Home Networking 2 48
Exchange 2010 Edge subscription question 1 27
#Citrix #Citrix Netscaler #HTTP Compression #Load Balance
Microservice architecture adoption brings many advantages, but can add intricacy. Selecting the right orchestration tool is most important for business specific needs.
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor ( offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor ( If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…

733 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question