[Last Call] Learn about multicloud storage options and how to improve your company's cloud strategy. Register Now

x
?
Solved

Unable to see all interfaces configured on Cisco ASA 5505

Posted on 2012-12-30
7
Medium Priority
?
374 Views
Last Modified: 2013-02-02
I have a Base license ASA 5505 that's restricted to  3 vlans

vlan1 is the inside interface 192.168.1.1
vlan2 is the outside interface x.x.x.x
vlan3 is being set up to be an isolated IP range so Ethernet 0/7 is enabled with a security level 100 and an IP of 192.168.168.1   (restricted traffic flow is set to restrict traffic to vlan1 (inside))

Now both the 192.168.1.1 interface and the 192.168.168.1 interfaces are connected to the same switch and from there I have a single test machine that is also connected to the same switch.

There is no DHCP set on either interfaces..    I have a static address set on the workstation of 192.168.168.2

my problem is I am not understanding why I can not even ping the 192.168.168.1   interface.

If I switch the workstation over to 192.168.1.2   I can see the 192.168.1.1  interface fine.

Am I missing something with the "restricted traffic flow"  setting

Enable traffic between two or more interfaces with the same security level is unchecked (ADSM)

And enable traffic between two or more hosts connected to the same interface is also unchecked   (ADSM)

Any help would be appreciated
0
Comment
Question by:dartagnansmith
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
7 Comments
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:rauenpc
ID: 38731552
Can you post configs? Is you switch configured with vlans?
0
 

Author Comment

by:dartagnansmith
ID: 38731598
I have not touched the vlan configs at all on the switch,  I assumed on HP procurve switches that all the ports are untagged.

I can post the config shortly .
0
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:Phyo HTET AUNG
ID: 38732080
If your workstations is Windows system, check arp result.. "arp -a" in command promt.

If the result is  "192.168.168.1            xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx     dynamic", Layer 2 is working correctly which mean problem area will be ASA only.

If the result is "incomplete", i would prefer direct testing which is your workstation is directly connected to 192.168.168.1 interface.

Hope this help.
Regards,
0
Q2 2017 - Latest Malware & Internet Attacks

WatchGuard’s Threat Lab is a group of dedicated threat researchers committed to helping you stay ahead of the bad guys by providing in-depth analysis of the top security threats to your network.  Check out our latest Quarterly Internet Security Report!

 

Author Comment

by:dartagnansmith
ID: 38828084
If I connect a note book directly to the interface every thing works fine.    I have subsequently upgraded the ASA to the Security + model.   and now have a total of 4 VLANS.

as long as I isolate the interface on its own switch every thing works fine.

I know the config you see below is missing a translation rule... but right now I just want to be able to ping the interface

I apologize ahead of time the config has changed a little since I first posted.  

 Result of the command: "show run"

: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password ****************** encrypted
passwd ************** encrypted
names
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/2
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
 switchport access vlan 4
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
 switchport access vlan 3
!
interface Vlan1
 nameif inside
 security-level 100
 ip address 192.168.169.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
 nameif outside
 security-level 0
 ip address *.*.*.* 255.255.255.224
!
interface Vlan3
 nameif ISOLATED
 security-level 100
 ip address 10.1.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan4
 nameif TEST
 security-level 100
 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
ftp mode passive
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
mtu ISOLATED 1500
mtu TEST 1500
no failover
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (ISOLATED) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 *.*.*.* 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
http server enable
http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto ca trustpoint _SmartCallHome_ServerCA
 crl configure
crypto ca certificate chain _SmartCallHome_ServerCA
 certificate ca 6ecc7aa5a7032009b8cebcf4e952d491

  quit
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
dhcpd auto_config outside
!
dhcpd address 192.168.169.170-192.168.169.254 inside
dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 interface inside
dhcpd enable inside
!
dhcpd address 10.1.10.100-10.1.10.110 ISOLATED
dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 interface ISOLATED
dhcpd enable ISOLATED
!

threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
webvpn
!
!
prompt hostname context

: end
0
 

Author Comment

by:dartagnansmith
ID: 38828100
and if I plug a notebook directly into the interface on the ASA every thing works fine.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
dartagnansmith earned 0 total points
ID: 38828477
I was able to solve the problem my self by assigning a dedicated MAC address to the 4th VLAN.

Thanks for all your help.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:dartagnansmith
ID: 38846406
I was able to research it my self
0

Featured Post

Are You Ready for GDPR?

With the GDPR deadline set for May 25, 2018, many organizations are ill-prepared due to uncertainty about the criteria for compliance. According to a recent WatchGuard survey, a staggering 37% of respondents don't even know if their organization needs to comply with GDPR. Do you?

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I recently had the displeasure of buying a new firewall at one of the buildings I play Sys Admin at. I had to get a better firewall than the cheap one that I had there since I was reconnecting the main office to the satellite office via point-to-poi…
I found an issue or “bug” in the SonicOS platform (the firmware controlling SonicWALL security appliances) that has to do with renaming Default Service Objects, which then causes a portion of the system to become uncontrollable and unstable. BACK…
Visualize your data even better in Access queries. Given a date and a value, this lesson shows how to compare that value with the previous value, calculate the difference, and display a circle if the value is the same, an up triangle if it increased…
Is your data getting by on basic protection measures? In today’s climate of debilitating malware and ransomware—like WannaCry—that may not be enough. You need to establish more than basics, like a recovery plan that protects both data and endpoints.…
Suggested Courses

650 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question